Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Electronic Chronic Pain Questions on patient-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization, and attitudes toward eCPQ use among patients and physicians: prospective pragmatic study in a US general practice setting.
Lamerato, Lois; Shah, Vinay; Abraham, Lucy; Cappelleri, Joseph C; DeLor, Bonnie; Ellsworth, Stacy R; Hegeman-Dingle, Rozelle; Park, Peter W.
Afiliação
  • Lamerato L; Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, United States.
  • Shah V; Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, United States.
  • Abraham L; Pfizer Ltd., Tadworth, Surrey, United Kingdom.
  • Cappelleri JC; Pfizer Inc., Newington, CT, United States.
  • DeLor B; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, United States.
  • Ellsworth SR; Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, United States.
  • Hegeman-Dingle R; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, United States.
  • Park PW; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, United States.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 933975, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37425316
ABSTRACT

Objective:

The Electronic Chronic Pain Questions (eCPQ) has been developed to help healthcare providers systematically capture chronic pain data. This study evaluated the impact of using the eCPQ on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in a primary care setting, and patient and physician perceptions regarding use of, and satisfaction with, the eCPQ.

Methods:

This was a prospective pragmatic study conducted at the Internal Medicine clinic within the Henry Ford Health (HFH) Detroit campus between June 2017 and April 2020. Patients (aged ≥18 years) attending the clinic for chronic pain were allocated to an Intervention Group to complete the eCPQ in addition to regular care, or a control group to receive regular care only. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and a Patient Global Assessment were assessed at baseline, 6-months, and 12-months study visits. HCRU data were extracted from the HFH database. Telephone qualitative interviews were conducted with randomly selected patients and physicians who used the eCPQ.

Results:

Two hundred patients were enrolled, 79 in each treatment group completed all 3 study visits. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in PROs and HCRU between the 2 groups. In qualitative interviews, physicians and patients reported the eCPQ as useful, and using the eCPQ improved patient-clinician interactions.

Conclusion:

Adding the eCPQ to regular care for patients with chronic pain did not significantly impact the PROs assessed in this study. However, qualitative interviews suggested that the eCPQ was a well-accepted and potentially useful tool from a patient and physician perspective. By using the eCPQ, patients were better prepared when they attended a primary care visit for their chronic pain and the quality of patient-physician communication was increased.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos