Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Surgical Outcomes of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy per Different First Assistant: Retrospective Analysis of 312 Cases.
Lee, Andrew; Lucasti, Christopher; Scott, Maxwell M; Patel, Dil V; Kohut, Kevin; Pavlesen, Sonja; Bayers-Thering, Mary; Hamill, Christopher L.
Afiliação
  • Lee A; From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 32(1): e33-e43, 2024 Jan 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37467386
INTRODUCTION: Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSOs) are complex spinal deformity surgeries that are associated with high complication rates. They are typically done by an experienced spine surgeon with another attending, resident, or physician assistant serving as the first assistant. The purpose of this study was to determine whether selecting a surgical team for single-level PSO based on case difficulty and fusion length could equalize intraoperative and perioperative outcomes among three groups: dual-attending (DA), attending and orthopaedic resident (RS), and attending and physician assistant (PA). METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of 312 patients undergoing single-level thoracic or lumbar PSO from January 2007 to December 2020 by a fellowship-trained orthopaedic spine surgeon. Demographic, intraoperative, and perioperative data within 30 days and 2 years of the index procedure were analyzed. RESULTS: Patient demographics did not markedly differ between surgical groups. The mean cohort age was 64.5 years with BMI 31.9 kg/m 2 . Patients with the DA approach had a significantly longer surgical time (DA = 412 min vs. resident = 372 min vs. physician assistant = 323 min; P < 0.001). Patients within the DA group experienced a significantly lower rate of infection (DA = 2.1% [3/140] vs. RS = 7.9% [9/114] vs. PA = 1.7% [1/58], P = 0.043), surgical complication rate (DA = 26% [37/140] vs. RS = 41% [47/114] vs. PA = 33% [19/58], P < 0 .001), and readmission rate (DA = 6.4% [9/140] vs. RS = 12.3% [14/114] vs. PA = 19% [11/58] P = 0.030) within 30 days of surgery. No notable differences were observed among groups in 2-year complication, infection, readmission, or revision surgery rates. CONCLUSIONS: These study results support the DA surgeon approach. Resident involvement, even in less complex cases, can still negatively affect perioperative outcomes. Additional selection criteria development is needed.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteotomia / Fusão Vertebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteotomia / Fusão Vertebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article