Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Consensus-defined sarcopenia predicts adverse outcomes after elective abdominal surgery: meta-analysis.
Park, Brittany; Bhat, Sameer; Xia, Weisi; Barazanchi, Ahmed W H; Frampton, Christopher; Hill, Andrew G; MacCormick, Andrew D.
Afiliação
  • Park B; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Bhat S; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Xia W; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Barazanchi AWH; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Frampton C; Department of Surgery, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Hill AG; Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • MacCormick AD; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
BJS Open ; 7(4)2023 07 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37542472
BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia refers to the progressive age- or pathology-associated loss of skeletal muscle. When measured radiologically as reduced muscle mass, sarcopenia has been shown to independently predict morbidity and mortality after elective abdominal surgery. However, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) recently updated their sarcopenia definition, emphasizing both low muscle 'strength' and 'mass'. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the prognostic impact of this updated consensus definition of sarcopenia after elective abdominal surgery. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were systematically searched for studies comparing prognostic outcomes between sarcopenic versus non-sarcopenic adults after elective abdominal surgery from inception to 15 June 2022. The primary outcomes were postoperative morbidity and mortality. Sensitivity analyses adjusting for confounding patient factors were also performed. Methodological quality assessment of studies was performed independently by two authors using the QUality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. RESULTS: Twenty articles with 5421 patients (1059 sarcopenic and 4362 non-sarcopenic) were included. Sarcopenic patients were at significantly greater risk of incurring postoperative complications, despite adjusted multivariate analysis (adjusted OR 1.56, 95 per cent c.i. 1.39 to 1.76). Sarcopenic patients also had significantly higher rates of in-hospital (OR 7.62, 95 per cent c.i. 2.86 to 20.34), 30-day (OR 3.84, 95 per cent c.i. 1.27 to 11.64), and 90-day (OR 3.73, 95 per cent c.i. 1.19 to 11.70) mortality. Sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for poorer overall survival in multivariate Cox regression analysis (adjusted HR 1.28, 95 per cent c.i. 1.13 to 1.44). CONCLUSION: Consensus-defined sarcopenia provides important prognostic information after elective abdominal surgery and can be appropriately measured in the preoperative setting. Development of targeted exercise-based interventions that minimize sarcopenia may improve outcomes for patients who are undergoing elective abdominal surgery.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sarcopenia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BJS Open Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sarcopenia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BJS Open Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia