Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging protocol in small hepatocellular carcinoma (≤2 cm) in high-risk patients.
Wang, Jia-Hui; Qiu, Qian-Sai; Dong, San-Yuan; Chen, Xiao-Shan; Wang, Wen-Tao; Yang, Yu-Tao; Sun, Wei; Rao, Sheng-Xiang.
Afiliação
  • Wang JH; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China.
  • Qiu QS; Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Dong SY; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China.
  • Chen XS; Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang WT; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China.
  • Yang YT; Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Sun W; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China.
  • Rao SX; Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Acta Radiol ; 64(10): 2687-2696, 2023 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37691270
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Biannual Ultrasound showed insufficient sensitivity in detecting small or early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (A-MRI) protocols with fewer sequences demonstrated higher HCC detection sensitivity than ultrasound with acceptable cost and examination time.

PURPOSE:

To compare the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced A-MRI with a full sequence MRI (F-MRI) protocol for small HCC (≤2 cm) in cirrhotic or hepatitis B virus-infected high-risk patients. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Two hundred and four consecutive patients with 166 pathologically confirmed small HCC who underwent preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were retrospectively included. A-MRI set comprised T1-weighted hepatobiliary phase imaging, T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient mapping. Two independent radiologists blinded to clinical data assessed the A-MRI set and F-MRI set. Per-patient HCC and per-lesion HCC diagnostic performance were compared.

RESULTS:

Per-patient HCC detection sensitivity of A-MRI set was 93.8% and 91.2% for observer 1 and observer 2, and, for the F-MRI set, the per-patient HCC detection sensitivity was 96.6% and 95.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference in per-patient sensitivity, specificity and per-lesion HCC detection sensitivity between the two imaging sets for both readers. (P = 0.06-0.25) The A-MRI set showed higher sensitivity on HCC without arterial phase hyperenhancement, and the F-MRI set demonstrated with higher sensitivity on HCC with arterial phase hyperenhancement (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

A-MRI using diagnostic criteria including hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase plus mild to moderate hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging or restricted diffusion demonstrated comparable sensitivity and specificity for small HCC compared to the F-MRI protocol in high-risk patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China