Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Stresses of Surrogate Decision-Making: Contributing Factors and Clinicians' Role in Mitigation.
Mishkin, Adrienne D; Allen, Nicole C; Cheung, Stephanie G; Faccini, Maria Carla; Flicker, Lauren S; Shalev, Daniel.
Afiliação
  • Mishkin AD; Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy Program, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Allen NC; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Cheung SG; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Faccini MC; Department of Psychiatry, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Flicker LS; Interpreter Services, Stanford Health, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Shalev D; Montefiore Einstein Center for Bioethics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; : 10499091231198750, 2023 Sep 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37704184
BACKGROUND: Surrogate Decision-Makers (surrogates) are frequently employed in decision-making for critically ill adults. There are insufficient data considering the surrogate experience, stress, and potential for mitigation. METHODS: An anonymous online survey queried (1) medical situation (2) total stress (3) demographics (4) potential factors, including sources of information about patient wishes, external sources of support or competing stressors, and their interactions with the medical team through the experience. RESULTS: 108 respondents were included; 91 completed all items. Most respondents ranked their experience as a surrogate as one of the most stressful experiences of their lives; this was associated with whether it was an end-of-life decision (P = .003), Respondent Religion (P = .015), or religious or spiritual beliefs (P = .024), and having their own health problems (P = .008). On individual Likert responses, surrogates reported significant stress mitigation when they felt they had been helpful (P < .001), knew the patient's wishes (P = .0011), specifically discussed patient wishes (P < .001), or patient's wishes were documented (P < .001). Items about surrogate-team interaction also met significance, including the physician being communicative and available (P < .001), respectful (P = .007), honest (P < .001), and validating (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Surrogate stress is an evolving area for research. Significant factors included relationship with the medical team, making this an important area for HPM to play a key role in mitigating surrogate stress.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Assunto da revista: ENFERMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Assunto da revista: ENFERMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos