Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pregnancy and Childbirth After Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Landrum, Matthew; Nocka, Heidi R; Ashebo, Leta; Hilmara, Didja; MacAlpine, Elle; Flynn, John M; Ho, Michelle; Newton, Peter O; Sponseller, Paul D; Lonner, Baron S; Cahill, Patrick J.
Afiliação
  • Landrum M; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
  • Nocka HR; University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
  • Ashebo L; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
  • Hilmara D; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
  • MacAlpine E; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
  • Flynn JM; Washington University in St. Louis Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Louis, MO.
  • Ho M; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
  • Newton PO; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Sponseller PD; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
  • Lonner BS; Rady Children's Hospital.
  • Cahill PJ; Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 43(10): 620-625, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37705419
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Little data exist on pregnancy and childbirth for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients treated with a spinal fusion. The current literature relies on data from patients treated with spinal fusion techniques and instrumentation, such as Harrington rods, that are no longer in use. The objective of our study is to understand the effects of spinal fusion in adolescence on pregnancy and childbirth.

METHODS:

Prospectively collected data of AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion that were enrolled in a multicenter study who have had a pregnancy and childbirth were reviewed. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared with national averages using χ 2 test of independence.

RESULTS:

A total of 78 babies were born to 53 AIS patients. As part of their pre-natal care, 24% of patients surveyed reported meeting with an anesthesiologist before delivery. The most common types of delivery were spontaneous vaginal delivery (46%, n=36/78) and planned cesarean section (20%, n=16/78). Compared with the national average, study patients had a higher rate of cesarean delivery ( P =0.021). Of the women who had a spontaneous vaginal birth, 53% had no anesthesia (n=19/36), 19% received intravenous intermittent opioids (n=7/36), and 31% had regional spinal or epidural anesthesia (n=11/36). spontaneous vaginal delivery patients in our study cohort received epidural or spinal anesthesia less frequently than the national average ( P <0.001). Of those (n=26 pregnancies) who did not have regional anesthesia (patients who had no anesthesia or utilized IV intermittent opioids), 19% (n=5 pregnancies) were told by their perinatal providers that it was precluded by previous spine surgery.

CONCLUSION:

The majority of AIS patients reported not meeting with an anesthesiologist before giving birth and those who had a planned C-section did so under obstetrician recommendation. The presence of instrumentation after spinal fusion should be avoided with attempted access to the spinal canal but should not dictate a delivery plan. A multidisciplinary team consisting of obstetrician, anesthesiologist, and orthopaedic surgeon can provide the most comprehensive information to empower a patient to make her decisions regarding birth experience anesthesia based on maternal rather than provider preference. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Orthop Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Orthop Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article