Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient and Clinician Sociodemographics and Sexual History Screening at a Multisite Federally Qualified Health Center: A Mixed Methods Study.
Gagnon, Kelly W; Coulter, Robert W S; Egan, James E; Ho, Ken; Hawk, Mary.
Afiliação
  • Gagnon KW; Division of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama kgagnon@uabmc.edu.
  • Coulter RWS; Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Egan JE; Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Ho K; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Hawk M; Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ann Fam Med ; 21(5): 395-402, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37748900
PURPOSE: In 2018, there were 68 million sexually transmitted infections in the United States. Sexual history screening is an evidence-based practice endorsed by guidelines to identify risk of these infections and adverse sexual health outcomes. In this mixed methods study, we investigated patient- and clinician-level characteristics associated with receipt of sexual history screening, and contextualized these differences in more depth. METHODS: We collected sociodemographics of patients from the electronic health record and sociodemographics of their primary care clinicians via a census survey. Semistructured interviews were conducted with key practice staff. We conducted multilevel crossed random effects logistic regression analysis and thematic analysis on quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 53,246 patients and 56 clinicians from 13 clinical sites participated. Less than one-half (42.4%) of the patients had any sexual history screening documented in their health record. Patients had significantly higher odds of documented screening if they were gay or lesbian (OR = 1.23), were cisgender women (OR = 1.10), or had clinicians who were cisgender women (OR = 1.80). Conversely, patients' odds of documented screening fell significantly with age (OR per year = 0.99) and with the number of patients their clinicians had on their panels (OR per patient = 0.99), and their odds were significantly lower if their primary language was not English (OR = 0.91). In interviews, key staff expressed discomfort discussing sexual health and noted assumptions about patients who are older, in long-term relationships, or from other cultures. Discordance of patient-clinician gender and patients' sexual orientation were also noted as barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions are needed to address the interplay between the social and contextual factors identified in this study, especially those that elicited discomfort, and the implementation of sexual history screening.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Sexual / Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ann Fam Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA DE FAMILIA E COMUNIDADE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Sexual / Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ann Fam Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA DE FAMILIA E COMUNIDADE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article