Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Qvella FAST System and the FAST-PBC cartridge for rapid species identification and antimicrobial resistance testing directly from positive blood cultures.
Sy, Issa; Bühler, Nina; Becker, Sören L; Jung, Philipp.
Afiliação
  • Sy I; Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University , Homburg, Germany.
  • Bühler N; Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University , Homburg, Germany.
  • Becker SL; Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University , Homburg, Germany.
  • Jung P; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute , Allschwil, Switzerland.
J Clin Microbiol ; 61(10): e0056923, 2023 10 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37768103
ABSTRACT
Blood culture diagnostics require rapid and accurate identification (ID) of pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Standard procedures, involving conventional cultivation on agar plates, may take up to 48 hours or more until AST completion. Recent approaches aim to shorten the processing time of positive blood cultures (PBC). The FAST System is a new technology, capable of purifying and concentrating bacterial/fungal pathogens from positive blood culture media and producing a bacterial suspension called "liquid colony" (LC), which can be further used in downstream analyses (e.g., ID and AST). Here, we evaluated the performance of the FAST System LC generated from PBC in comparison to our routine workflow including ID by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry using Sepsityper, AST by automatized MicroScan WalkAway plus and directly inoculated disk diffusion (DD), and MICRONAUT-AM for yeast/fungi. A total of 261 samples were analyzed, of which 86.6% (226/261) were eligible for the comparative ID and AST analyses. In comparison to the reference technique (culture-grown colonies), ID concordance of the FAST System LC and Sepsityper was 150/154 (97.4%) and 123/154 (79.9%), respectively, for Gram positive; 67/70 (95.7%) and 64/70 (91.4%), respectively, for Gram negative. For AST, categorical agreement (CA) of the FAST System LC in comparison to the routine workflow for Gram-positive bacteria was 96.1% and 98.7% for MicroScan and DD, respectively. Similar results were obtained for Gram-negative bacteria with 96.6% and 97.5% of CA for MicroScan and DD, respectively. Taken together, the FAST System LC allowed the laboratory to significantly reduce the time to obtain correct ID and AST (automated MicroScan) results 1 day earlier and represents a promising tool to expedite the processing of PBC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bacteriemia / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Microbiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bacteriemia / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Microbiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha