Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep immunophenotypic analysis of the bone marrow progenitor cells in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Shameli, Afshin; Dharmani-Khan, Poonam; Auer, Iwona; Shabani-Rad, Meer-Taher.
Afiliação
  • Shameli A; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, WA, United States. Electronic address: ashameli@uw.edu.
  • Dharmani-Khan P; Division of Hematopathology, Alberta Precision Laboratories, South Zone, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  • Auer I; Division of Hematopathology, Alberta Precision Laboratories, South Zone, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  • Shabani-Rad MT; Division of Hematopathology, Alberta Precision Laboratories, South Zone, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Leuk Res ; 134: 107401, 2023 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37774446
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is often challenging and requires integration of clinical, morphologic, cytogenetics and molecular information. Flow cytometry immunophenotyping (FCIP) can support the diagnosis by demonstration of numerical and immunophenotypic abnormalities of progenitor and maturing myelomonocytic and erythroid populations. We have previously shown that comprehensive immunophenotypic analysis of the progenitor population is valuable in the diagnosis of MDS and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN). This study was designed to improve the analysis method and confirm its value in a larger cohort of patients.

METHODS:

FCIP of bone marrow samples from 105 patients with cytopenia(s) (with or without leukocytosis) and clinical concern for MDS or MDS/MPN was performed using a single-tube/10-color/13-marker assay. A modified analysis approach was used to obtain 11 progenitor parameters and 2 myelomonocytic parameters.

RESULTS:

Significantly higher number of abnormalities were identified in MDS and MDS/MPN cases when compared to cytopenic patients not meeting the diagnostic criteria for MDS (Non-MDS). A FCIP score that combined the 13 parameters showed a sensitivity of 89.8% and specificity of 93.5% for the diagnosis of MDS and MDS/MPN. The sensitivity was 100% for both MDS/MPN and higher-risk MDS, and 81.3% for lower-risk MDS.

CONCLUSION:

This study confirms that detailed immunophenotypic analysis of the progenitor population is powerful in the diagnosis of MDS and MDS/MPN. The combination of markers used in the panel allowed for evaluation of two relatively new parameters, namely myeloid progenitor heterogeneity and stem cell aberrancy, which improved the sensitivity of the assay for lower-risk MDS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndromes Mielodisplásicas / Doenças Mieloproliferativas-Mielodisplásicas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Leuk Res Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndromes Mielodisplásicas / Doenças Mieloproliferativas-Mielodisplásicas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Leuk Res Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article