Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Beef embryos in dairy cows: calfhood growth of Angus-sired calves from Holstein, Jersey, and crossbred beef dams.
Fuerniss, Luke K; Young, J Daniel; Hall, Jerica R; Wesley, Kaitlyn R; Benitez, Oscar J; Corah, Larry R; Rathmann, Ryan J; Johnson, Bradley J.
Afiliação
  • Fuerniss LK; Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
  • Young JD; Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
  • Hall JR; Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
  • Wesley KR; Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
  • Benitez OJ; Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
  • Corah LR; Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA.
  • Rathmann RJ; Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
  • Johnson BJ; Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Transl Anim Sci ; 7(1): txad096, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37799707
ABSTRACT
Improved reproductive management has allowed dairy cow pregnancies to be optimized for beef production. The objective of this sire-controlled study was to characterize the effects of beef or dairy maternal genetics and the dairy management system on calf growth. Pregnancies were created with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of dam breed (Holstein or Jersey) and mating type (artificial insemination or implantation of an in vitro produced embryo from a commercial beef cow oocyte). Resulting calves were reared in a calf ranch. Additionally, commercial beef cows were inseminated and reared resulting calves on range. Therefore, the five treatments were Angus × Holstein (A × H; n = 19), Angus × Jersey (A × J; n = 22), Angus × beef gestated by Holstein (H ET; n = 18), Angus × beef gestated by Jersey (J ET; n = 8), and Angus × beef raised by beef (A × B; n = 20). Beginning at birth, calf body weight, cannon circumference, forearm circumference, top width, hip width, and hip height were measured approximately every 28 d until ~196 d of age. At birth, A × J calves weighed the least (P < 0.01). At 150 d of age, body weight was greatest (P < 0.05) among A × B calves, intermediate among H ET and A × H calves, and least among J ET and A × J calves (P < 0.05). Morphometric differences were detected between treatments (multivariate analysis of variance, P < 0.01). Primary discriminant function scores identified A × B calves having lesser values than A × J or A × H calves (analysis of variance [ANOVA], P < 0.01); A × B calves had greater cannon circumference, greater top width, and less hip height (standardized loadings of -0.47, -0.48, and 0.63, respectively). Secondary discriminant function scores identified J ET and H ET to have greater forearm circumference-a key indicator of muscling-than A × J or A × H (ANOVA, P < 0.01; standardized loading of 0.99). The dairy management system limited growth rate of beef genetics compared to the beef management system. In addition, Holstein dams transmitted greater growth potential than Jersey dams. Replacing maternal dairy genetics with beef genetics moderated frame size and created a more muscular phenotype.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Transl Anim Sci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Transl Anim Sci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos