Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Airway topicalization in pediatric anesthesia: An international cross-sectional study.
Iliff, H A; Baxter, A; Chakladar, A; Endlich, Y; McGuire, B; Peyton, J.
Afiliação
  • Iliff HA; Department of Anaesthesia, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
  • Baxter A; Health Education and Improvement Wales, Cardiff, UK.
  • Chakladar A; Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Endlich Y; Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
  • McGuire B; Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Adelaide Women's and Children's Hospital, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Peyton J; Department of Anaesthesia, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 34(2): 145-152, 2024 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37818989
BACKGROUND: There is no national or international consensus or guideline on recommended dosing of lidocaine for airway topicalization in children. Doses quoted in the literature vary substantially. AIMS: The primary aim of the study was to ascertain current international dosing practices (mg.kg-1 and concentration of solution) for lidocaine airway topicalization in children. The secondary aims included examining aftercare instructions for those receiving lidocaine airway topicalization and instances of local anesthetic systemic toxicity secondary to the use of lidocaine for airway topicalization in pediatric patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study consisted of 11-20 questions across three domains-population demographics, clinical practice, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity. It adhered to the consensus-based checklist for reporting of survey studies. Responses were collected over 14 weeks using a combination of probability (cluster and simple random) and nonprobability (purposive, convenience and snowball) sampling. Data were analyzed based on the response rate per question with proportions expressed as percentages and nonparametric data expressed as median (interquartile range [range]) in an effort to minimize nonresponse error. No weighting of items or propensity scoring was applied. RESULTS: After initial exclusions, 1501 participants from 69 countries, across six continents, were included. Consultant anesthetists or those with an equivalent level of experience accounted for 1262/1501 (84.1%) of responses. Results showed heterogeneity in dosing and timing regimens and evidence that dosing may contribute to adverse outcomes. The maximum dose reported by participants who use lidocaine for airway topicalization as part of their normal practice was 5 mg.kg-1 (4-6 mg.kg-1 [0.5-50]) median (interquartile range [range]) over 2 h (1-4 h [0-30]). CONCLUSION: The results support the need for further research and consensus in this area, in order to provide safe provision of lidocaine airway topicalization in children. It is hoped the results of this study can support future collaborative work in this area.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anestesia Pediátrica / Anestésicos Locais Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Paediatr Anaesth Assunto da revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anestesia Pediátrica / Anestésicos Locais Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Paediatr Anaesth Assunto da revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article