Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience.
Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrés R; Huang, Jasmine; Schaheen, Lara; Smith, Michael A; Hashimi, Samad; Bremner, Ross M; Mittal, Sumeet K.
Afiliação
  • Latorre-Rodríguez AR; Norton Thoracic Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 500 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
  • Huang J; Norton Thoracic Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 500 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
  • Schaheen L; Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix Regional Campus, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Smith MA; Norton Thoracic Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 500 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
  • Hashimi S; Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix Regional Campus, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Bremner RM; Norton Thoracic Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 500 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
  • Mittal SK; Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix Regional Campus, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 397, 2023 Oct 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37831200
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Esophageal anastomotic leaks (ALs) after esophagectomy are a common and serious complication. The incidence, diagnostic approach, and management have changed over time. We described the diagnosis and management of patients who developed an esophageal AL after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at our center.

METHODS:

After IRB approval, we queried our prospectively maintained database for patients who developed an esophageal AL after esophagectomy from August 2016 through July 2022. Data pertaining to demographics, comorbidities, surgical and oncological characteristics, and clinical course were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS:

During the study period, 145 patients underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; 10 (6.9%) developed an AL, diagnosed a median of 7.5 days after surgery, and detected by enteric contents in wound drains (n = 3), endoscopy (n = 3), CT (n = 2), and contrast esophagogram (n = 2). Nine patients (90%) had an increasing white blood cell count and additional signs of sepsis. One asymptomatic patient was identified by contrast esophagography. All patients received enteral nutritional support, intravenous antibiotics, and antifungals. Primary treatment of ALs included endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS; n = 6), surgery (n = 2), and SEMS with endoluminal vacuum therapy (n = 2). One patient required surgery after SEMS placement. The median length of ICU and total hospital stays were 11.5 and 22.5 days, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION:

The incidence of esophageal ALs at our center is similar to that of other high-volume centers. Most ALs can be managed without surgery; however, ALs remain a significant source of postoperative morbidity despite clinical advancements that have improved mortality.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Fístula Anastomótica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Langenbecks Arch Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Fístula Anastomótica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Langenbecks Arch Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos