Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety of Same-Day Hospital Discharge Post Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Findings from a Multicenter Study.
Blusztein, David; Sarwary, Shabir; Parikh, Devang S; Garcia, Santiago; Price, Matthew J; Nayak, Keshav; Aragon, Joseph; Mahadevan, Vaikom S.
Afiliação
  • Blusztein D; Department of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: davidblusztein@gmail.com.
  • Sarwary S; Department of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Parikh DS; Department of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Garcia S; Department of Cardiology, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Price MJ; Department of Cardiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California.
  • Nayak K; Department of Cardiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California.
  • Aragon J; Department of Cardiology, Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, Santa Barba, California.
  • Mahadevan VS; Department of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Am J Cardiol ; 208: 118-123, 2023 12 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37832208
Transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is indicated for patients with cryptogenic stroke. Although procedural safety is well established, there are limited data on the safety of same-day (SD) discharge. We aimed to review the outcomes of PFO closure with SD. Patients who underwent transcatheter PFO closure between January 2011 and May 2022 at 4 large US hospitals were retrospectively analyzed, comparing outcomes of SD versus delayed discharge (DD). The primary end point was a composite of access-site complication, stroke, device embolization, atrial arrhythmia, and bleeding. Secondary analysis comparing imaging modality and outcomes was performed. 554 patients (49.2% female) were analyzed (382 discharged SD). Average age was 54.3 ± 15. Baseline characteristics in both groups were broadly similar. Previous stroke (78.0% SD vs 76.2% DD, p = 0.32) was the commonest indication for PFO closure. In the SD group, there was less general anesthesia use (5.5% vs 16.9%, p <0.001). Intraprocedural intracardiac echocardiography was used more frequently in SD cases (95.0% vs 81.4%, p <0.001). In the DD group, median stay was 1 night, and 34.9% stayed beyond 1 night. At 30 days, there was no difference in the primary composite end point (14.9% vs 11.6%, p = 0.15). There was no inter-group difference in individual adverse events (all p >0.05). When comparing imaging modality and outcomes, there was no difference in composite end points between transesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography (6.5% vs 14.7%, p = 0.063). In conclusion, SD discharge after transcatheter PFO closure appears safe. This efficient approach may be advantageous in optimizing workflow and minimizing hospital occupancy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Forame Oval Patente Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Forame Oval Patente Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article