Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survival outcomes of esophageal cancer patients with recurrence after curative treatments.
Sugawara, Kotaro; Oka, Daiji; Hara, Hiroki; Yoshii, Takako; Ushijima, Hiroki; Kudo, Shigehiro; Fukuda, Takashi.
Afiliação
  • Sugawara K; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center Hospital, 780 Komuro Inamachi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan. sugawara.kotaro@saitama-pho.jp.
  • Oka D; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center Hospital, 780 Komuro Inamachi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan.
  • Hara H; Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
  • Yoshii T; Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
  • Ushijima H; Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
  • Kudo S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
  • Fukuda T; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center Hospital, 780 Komuro Inamachi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 1051, 2023 Nov 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37915027
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Little is known about predictive factors for survival outcomes of esophageal carcinoma (EC) patients who developed recurrence after undergoing multimodal therapies. We aimed to investigate long-term outcomes and identify prognostic factors in patients with relapsed EC, focusing especially on those with oligometastasis (OM).

METHODS:

EC patients who developed recurrence after curative treatments (radical esophagectomy or definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT)) between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. Multivariate Cox hazards models were applied to determine independent predictors of poor post-recurrence survival (PRS).

RESULTS:

In total, 178 patients were included. The median PRS was 12.9 months. Of the 178 patients, 98 had OM and 80 non-OM (NOM) disease. The survival outcomes of patients with OM were significantly better than those of patients with NOM (P < 0.01). Surgical treatments provided significantly better survival outcomes than CRT or chemo-/radiotherapy alone (3-year overall survival (OS); 78.1% vs. 42.5% vs. 28.9%, P < 0.01), mainly due to prolonging survival after the recurrence (3-year PRS 62.9% vs. 16.7% vs. 16.2%, P < 0.01). Multivariable analysis focusing on patients with OM revealed cStage III-IV disease (P < 0.01), high GPS at the time of recurrence (P = 0.02) and non-curative treatments (P < 0.01), to be independently associated with poor PRS. In contrast, in patients with NOM, no independent predictors for poor PRS were identified.

CONCLUSIONS:

The survival outcomes of patients with relapsed EC remain poor. Surgical treatments could provide survival benefits for patients with recurrent EC, especially for patients with OM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão