Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the German version of the Comparative Psychotherapy Process Scale.
Reininger, Klaus Michael; Biel, Hannah Marie; Algner-Herzmann, David; Hennig, Timo; Liebherz, Sarah; Kröger, Christoph; Moritz, Steffen; Briken, Peer; Löwe, Bernd.
Afiliação
  • Reininger KM; Institute of Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.
  • Biel HM; Institute of Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.
  • Algner-Herzmann D; Institute of Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.
  • Hennig T; Department of Inclusive Education, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Potsdam.
  • Liebherz S; Institute of Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.
  • Kröger C; Institute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim.
  • Moritz S; Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.
  • Briken P; Institute of Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.
  • Löwe B; Institute of Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.
Psychotherapy (Chic) ; 61(1): 93-100, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38032633
ABSTRACT
The Comparative Psychotherapy Process Scale (CPPS) is a 20-item scale which aims to capture technical features distinguishing cognitive behavioral (CBT) from psychodynamic (PD) psychotherapy (and vice versa) in two corresponding subscales (CBT and PD Subscale). Our objective was to validate a German self-report version of the CPPS regarding a previous psychotherapy session in a psychotherapist- and in a patient-version. Fifty-three psychotherapists and their 53 patients answered to the according German CPPS Scale as well as to specific subscales of the Multitheoretical List of Therapeutic Interventions self-report-instrument (MULTI-30 subscales) assessing CBT- and PD-specific intervention characteristics. We analyzed (a) the correlation of the CPPS with the MULTI-30 subscales, (b) the ability of the CPPS to distinguish whether therapy sessions were either CBT or PD using logistic regression, and (c) the correlation between psychotherapists' and patients' self-report regarding the preceding session (correlation). Both the psychotherapist- and the patient-version showed acceptable to good values of internal consistencies (α = .78-.84). The CBT and PD Subscales of the MULTI-30 correlated with the CPPS subscales in both versions (CBT rs = .85 [psychotherapist-version] and .80 [patient-version], PD rs = .79 [both versions]). Subscales correctly discriminated whether the previous session was a CBT or a PD session (correct predictions in 88.7% in the psychotherapist-version, 73.6% in the patient-version; χ² ≥ 14.03, p < .001). The German version of the CPPS is a promising instrument to facilitate research on CBT- and PD-specific psychotherapy processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processos Psicoterapêuticos / Psicoterapia Psicodinâmica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychotherapy (Chic) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processos Psicoterapêuticos / Psicoterapia Psicodinâmica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychotherapy (Chic) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article