Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Eligibility and efficacy of a CPC- and CHX-based antiviral mouthwash for the elimination of SARS-CoV-2 from the saliva: A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.
Brunello, Giulia; Wolf, Viktoria; Kerberger, Robert; Bernhard, Michael; Lübke, Nadine; Becker, Jürgen; Schwarz-Herzke, Beryl; Timm, Jörg; Becker, Kathrin.
Afiliação
  • Brunello G; Department of Oral Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Wolf V; Department of Neurosciences, Dentistry Section, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Kerberger R; Department of Oral Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Bernhard M; Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Lübke N; Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Becker J; Emergency Department, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Schwarz-Herzke B; Institute of Virology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Timm J; Department of Oral Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Becker K; Institute for Anatomy II, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
J Clin Periodontol ; 51(2): 158-166, 2024 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38058254
AIM: This study aimed at investigating the efficacy of a 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride-0.05% chlorhexidine (CPC-CHX) mouthwash in reducing viral load in the saliva as compared with sterile water. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were asked to dispense 4 mL of saliva. Half the patients rinsed for 60 s with 15 mL CPC-CHX, and the remaining patients rinsed with sterile water (control). Four millilitres of saliva were collected after 15, 30 and 60 min after rinsing. Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) specific for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein were performed. For ELISA, the intact (representing the active virus) to total virus load (I/T) was calculated. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 copy numbers/mL from RT-qPCR tended to decrease in the control group, whereas in the CPC-CHX group, an increase was observed after T30. However, mixed linear model analysis revealed no statistical differences between groups (p = .124), time points (p = .616) and vaccinated or non-vaccinated patients (p = .953). Similarly, no impact of group (p = .880), time points (p = .306) and vaccination (p = .711) was observed for I/T ratio values. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitation of this study, there was no evidence that the intervention reduced salivary SARS-CoV-2 viral load during the course of 60 min. Therefore, commonly used pre-procedural rinsing might not be clinically relevant.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antivirais / COVID-19 / Antissépticos Bucais Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Periodontol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antivirais / COVID-19 / Antissépticos Bucais Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Periodontol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha