Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using normalization process theory to evaluate the use of patient-centred outcome measures in specialist palliative home care-a qualitative interview study.
Lehmann-Emele, Eva; Jansky, Maximiliane; Clapham, Sabina; de Wolf-Linder, Susanne; Bausewein, Claudia; Hodiamont, Farina.
Afiliação
  • Lehmann-Emele E; Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. eva.lehmann@med.uni-muenchen.de.
  • Jansky M; Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center, Georg August University Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany. eva.lehmann@med.uni-muenchen.de.
  • Clapham S; Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center, Georg August University Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
  • de Wolf-Linder S; Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
  • Bausewein C; School of Health Science, Institute of Nursing, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
  • Hodiamont F; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
BMC Palliat Care ; 23(1): 1, 2024 Jan 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166973
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Standardised use of patient-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) improves aspects of quality of care. Normalization Process Theory (NPT) considers the social (inter-)actions of implementation processes operationalised through four constructs coherence-building, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring. The aim of the study was to identify barriers and enablers for the successful use of PCOMs in specialist palliative home care (SPHC) using NPT, to collect clinically meaningful and reliable data to improve patient outcomes.

METHODS:

Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with palliative care professionals from German SPHC teams who participated in a study using PCOMs. Data were analysed using Framework analysis, and contextualised within NPT.

RESULTS:

Seventeen interviews across five teams were conducted. Some teams already had an understanding of what PCOMs are and how to use them, based on previous experience. In other teams, this understanding developed through the perception of the benefits (coherence). Participation and engagement depended on individuals and was decisive for coherence-building. The attitude of the management level also played a major role (cognitive participation). Integration of PCOMs into everyday clinical practice varied and depended on the manifestation of the first two constructs and other already established routines (collective action). In the context of appraisal, both positive (e.g. focus on patient) and negative aspects (e.g. additional work) of using PCOMs were mentioned (reflexive monitoring).

CONCLUSIONS:

Although benefits of using PCOMs were partly recognised, not all teams continued standardised use. Here, not only the social (inter-)actions, but also the influence of the context (working environment) were decisive. Future implementation strategies should consider integrating PCOMs in existing electronic patient records, education sessions supporting coherence-building, internal facilitators/local champions, and ensuring frequent data analyses as it is beneficial and increases the readiness of using PCOMs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Palliat Care Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Palliat Care Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha