Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perceived Health Status and Capability after Hip Fracture: Secondary Outcomes from an Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ashe, Maureen C; Grover, Sanya; Bryan, Stirling; Cook, Wendy L; Donaldson, Meghan G; Brasher, Penelope M A.
Afiliação
  • Ashe MC; Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Grover S; Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Bryan S; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Cook WL; UBC School of Population and Public Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Donaldson MG; Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Brasher PMA; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, UBC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Gerontology ; 70(3): 235-240, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38185111
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Hip fractures can have a significant impact on the lives of older people and their families. We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of post-discharge comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) for community-dwelling older adults after a surgically repaired hip fracture. The objective of this study was to conduct a secondary analysis to compare changes in health status and perceived capability from baseline to 12 months after randomization with the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) (1) utility score and (2) visual analog scale (VAS); and (3) well-being as measured by participants' perceptions of their ability (or capability) toward completing life activities using the ICEpop Capability Measure for Older People (ICECAP-O).

METHODS:

We tested the effect of usual care (control) versus usual care and an outpatient CGC clinic (intervention) on mobility after hip fracture in community-dwelling older adults (65 years+). In this secondary analysis, we report the following

outcomes:

EQ-5D-5L utility score and VAS collected monthly via telephone and ICECAP-O collected in person three times at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Data were analyzed using area under the curve and regression adjusted for baseline values for utility scores and capability, and constrained longitudinal data analysis for VAS.

RESULTS:

We enrolled 53 older adults, including 34 women and 19 men, with mean (SD) age of 80 (8) years. There were no statistical or clinically meaningful differences between groups (control group - intervention group values) for all variables utility score = -0.028 (95% CI -0.071, 0.014; p = 0.18); VAS -0.03 (95% CI -0.39 to 0.33; p = 0.86); and capability = -0.021 (95% CI -0.090, 0.046; p = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS:

There were no differences in outcomes between groups over 12 months, but values remained constant, contrary to a potential decline for this age group, especially after a major life event like a hip fracture.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência ao Convalescente / Fraturas do Quadril Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Gerontology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência ao Convalescente / Fraturas do Quadril Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Gerontology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá