Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability and validity of the online application of London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale in assessing dyspnea-related functional impairment in individuals after hospitalization for COVID-19.
Silva, Isabela Julia Cristiana Santos; Barbosa, Graziele Besen; Isoppo, Karoliny Dos Santos; Karloh, Manuela; Mayer, Anamaria Fleig.
Afiliação
  • Silva IJCS; Núcleo de Assistência, Ensino e Pesquisa em Reabilitação Pulmonar (NuReab), Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
  • Barbosa GB; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia, Centro de Ciências da Saúde e do Esporte (CEFID), Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
  • Isoppo KDS; Núcleo de Assistência, Ensino e Pesquisa em Reabilitação Pulmonar (NuReab), Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
  • Karloh M; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia, Centro de Ciências da Saúde e do Esporte (CEFID), Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
  • Mayer AF; Núcleo de Assistência, Ensino e Pesquisa em Reabilitação Pulmonar (NuReab), Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Disabil Rehabil ; : 1-6, 2024 Jan 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38226600
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the LCADL scale applied via online form in individuals after hospitalization for COVID-19.

METHODS:

Methodological study. After hospitalization for COVID-19 individuals completed the LCADL via online form at two separate times. They also answered the post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale (PCFS), dyspnea, fatigue, and health perception scales, modified Medical Research Council (MRCm), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). Hospitalization data were collected from the individual's medical record.

RESULTS:

104 individuals participated in the study (57 men, 45.2 ± 11.9 years). The LCADL showed moderately to high test-retest reliability (ICC 0.73-0.86; p < 0.001), there was no difference in scores between test and retest (p > 0.05), the mean difference between the applications was smaller than the standard error of measurement and the internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach's α = 0.70-0.94). In addition, it demonstrated adequate construct validity, showing correlations with PCFS, dyspnea perception, fatigue and health scales, mMRC, SF-36, and length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit (p < 0.05). The LCADL as percentage of the total score presented a significant floor effect (25%).

CONCLUSION:

The LCADL applied online was reliable and valid for assessing limitations due to dyspnea in ADL in individuals after hospitalization for COVID-19.
The London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale applied online is a method of evaluation of dyspnea-related ADL limitations that is valid and reliable after hospitalization for COVID-19 and can be used both in the telerehabilitation environment and in-person rehabilitation;The online form provides a more sustainable means of data storage, since no paper is needed, and saves time during in-person rehabilitation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Disabil Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Disabil Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil