Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An experimental examination of neurostimulation and cognitive restructuring as potential components for Misophonia interventions.
Neacsiu, Andrada D; Beynel, Lysianne; Gerlus, Nimesha; LaBar, Kevin S; Bukhari-Parlakturk, Noreen; Rosenthal, M Zachary.
Afiliação
  • Neacsiu AD; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Center for Misophonia and Emotional Dysregulation, Durham, NC, USA; Brain Stimulation Research Center, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: andrada.neacsiu@duke.edu.
  • Beynel L; National Institute for Mental Health, Bethesta, DC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: lysianne.beynel@nih.gov.
  • Gerlus N; Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: nimesha.gerlus@duke.edu.
  • LaBar KS; Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: klabar@duke.edu.
  • Bukhari-Parlakturk N; Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: noreen.bukhari@duke.edu.
  • Rosenthal MZ; Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Center for Misophonia and Emotional Dysregulation, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: mark.rosenthal@duke.edu.
J Affect Disord ; 350: 274-285, 2024 Apr 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38228276
ABSTRACT
Misophonia is a disorder of decreased tolerance to certain aversive, repetitive common sounds, or to stimuli associated with these sounds. Two matched groups of adults (29 participants with misophonia and 30 clinical controls with high emotion dysregulation) received inhibitory neurostimulation (1 Hz) over a personalized medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) target functionally connected to the left insula; excitatory neurostimulation (10 Hz) over a personalized dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) target; and sham stimulation over either target. Stimulations were applied while participants were either listening or cognitively downregulating emotions associated with personalized aversive, misophonic, or neutral sounds. Subjective units of distress (SUDS) and psychophysiological measurements (e.g., skin conductance response [SCR] and level [SCL]) were collected. Compared to controls, participants with misophonia reported higher distress (∆SUDS = 1.91-1.93, ps < 0.001) when listening to and when downregulating misophonic distress. Both types of neurostimulation reduced distress significantly more than sham, with excitatory rTMS providing the most benefit (Cohen's dSUDS = 0.53; dSCL = 0.14). Excitatory rTMS also enhanced the regulation of emotions associated with misophonic sounds in both groups when measured by SUDS (dcontrol = 1.28; dMisophonia = 0.94), and in the misophonia group alone when measured with SCL (d = 0.20). Both types of neurostimulation were well tolerated. Engaging in cognitive restructuring enhanced with high-frequency neurostimulation led to the lowest misophonic distress, highlighting the best path forward for misophonia interventions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Emoções / Terapia de Reestruturação Cognitiva Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Affect Disord Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Emoções / Terapia de Reestruturação Cognitiva Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Affect Disord Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article