Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment of ocular rosacea: a systematic review.
Avraham, Shani; Khaslavsky, Sophie; Kashetsky, Nadia; Starkey, Samantha Y; Zaslavsky, Kirill; Lam, Joseph M; Mukovozov, Ilya.
Afiliação
  • Avraham S; Foresee Eyecare, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Khaslavsky S; Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Kashetsky N; Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
  • Starkey SY; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Zaslavsky K; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Lam JM; Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Mukovozov I; BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 22(2): 167-174, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38243868
ABSTRACT
Rosacea is a common chronic skin disease distributed primarily around the central face. Ocular manifestations of rosacea are poorly studied, and estimates of prevalence vary widely, ranging from 6% to 72% in the rosacea population. Treatment options for ocular rosacea include lid hygiene, topical and oral antibiotics, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, oral vitamin A derivatives, and intense pulsed light; however, a direct comparison of treatment methods for ocular rosacea is lacking. This review aims to compare treatment efficacy and adverse events for different treatment modalities in ocular rosacea. We performed a systematic review by searching Cochrane, MEDLINE and Embase. Title, abstract, full text screening, and data extraction were done in duplicate. Sixty-six articles met the inclusion criteria, representing a total of 1,275 patients. The most effective treatment modalities were topical antimicrobials and oral antibiotics, which achieved complete or partial response in 91% (n = 82/90) and 89% (n = 525/580) of patients respectively, followed by intense pulsed light (89%, n = 97/109 partial response), cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion (87% n = 40/46), and lid hygiene (65%, n = 67/105). Combination treatments achieved a complete or partial response in 90% (n = 69/77). Results suggest that topical antimicrobials, oral antibiotics, intense pulsed light. and cyclosporine were the most efficacious single modality treatments.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermatopatias / Rosácea Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Dtsch Dermatol Ges Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermatopatias / Rosácea Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Dtsch Dermatol Ges Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá