Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Efficacy of internet-based interventions for depression available in Germany-A systematic review and meta-analysis]. / Wirksamkeit in Deutschland verfügbarer internetbasierter Interventionen für Depressionen ­ ein systematisches Review mit Metaanalyse.
Haaf, Raoul; Vock, Pia; Wächtershäuser, Nikolaj; Correll, Christoph U; Köhler, Stephan; Klein, Jan Philipp.
Afiliação
  • Haaf R; Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland. Raoul.Haaf@charite.de.
  • Vock P; Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
  • Wächtershäuser N; Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
  • Correll CU; Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
  • Köhler S; Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.
  • Klein JP; Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Nervenarzt ; 95(3): 206-215, 2024 Mar.
Article em De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38260995
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Internet-based interventions (IBIs) for the treatment of depression have been found to have positive effects in international meta-analyses; however, it is unclear whether these effects also extend to IBIs specifically available in Germany. The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the immediate effects and the long-term effects of IBIs available in Germany free of charge or available on prescription and covered by the public health insurances as so-called digital health applications (DiGAs) and to compare the efficacy of DiGAs and freely available IBIs.

METHOD:

A systematic literature search and random-effects meta-analysis were performed (preregistration INPLASY202250070). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IBIs freely available in Germany or as DiGA in adults with elevated depressive symptoms were compared with active and inactive controls available at the time of the survey in May 2022.

RESULTS:

A total of six interventions were identified COGITO, deprexis, iFightDepression, moodgym, Novego, and Selfapy. The pooled effect size of a total of 28 studies with 13,413 participants corresponded to an effect of Cohen's d = 0.42, (95% confidence interval, CI 0.31-0.54, I2 = 81%). The analysis of long-term effects showed a smaller effect size of d = 0.29, (95% CI 0.21-0.37, I2 = 22%, N = 10). Subgroup analyses indicated a possible superiority of the three interventions listed in the DiGA directory (d = 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.74, I2 = 83%, N = 15) compared to the three freely available IBIs (d = 0.24, 95% CI 0.14-0.33, I2 = 44%, N = 13, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION:

The IBIs for depressive disorders available in Germany are effective and can therefore be used in the treatment of people with a depressive disorder; however, it is possible that not all interventions are equally effective.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Depressão / Intervenção Baseada em Internet Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: De Revista: Nervenarzt Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Depressão / Intervenção Baseada em Internet Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: De Revista: Nervenarzt Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article