Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Shared decision-making with older adults with cancer: Adaptation of a model through literature review and expert opinion.
Gans, Emma A; Pieterse, Arwen H; Klapwijk, Maartje S; van Stiphout, Feikje; van Steenbergen, Irma J; Portielje, Johanneke E A; de Groot, Janke F; van Munster, Barbara C; van den Bos, Frederiek.
Afiliação
  • Gans EA; University Center of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Pieterse AH; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Klapwijk MS; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van Stiphout F; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van Steenbergen IJ; Department of Geriatric Internal Medicine, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
  • Portielje JEA; Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • de Groot JF; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van Munster BC; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • van den Bos F; University Center of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Psychooncology ; 33(1): e6291, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38282224
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To provide a literature overview of characteristics of Shared Decision Making (SDM) with specific importance to the older adult population with cancer and to tailor an existing model of SDM in patients with cancer to the needs of older adults.

METHODS:

A systematic search of several databases was conducted. Eligible studies described factors influencing SDM concerning cancer treatment with adults aged 65 years or above, with any type of cancer. We included qualitative or mixed-methods studies. Themes were identified and discussed in an expert panel, including a patient-representative, until consensus was reached on an adjusted model.

RESULTS:

Overall 29 studies were included and nine themes were identified from the literature. The themes related to the importance of goal setting, need for tailored information provision, the role of significant others, uncertainty of evidence, the importance of time during and outside of consultations, the possible ill-informed preconceptions that health care professionals (HCPs) might have about older adults and the specific competencies they need to engage in the SDM process with older adults. No new themes emerged from discussion with expert panel. This study presents a visual model of SDM with older patients with cancer based on the identified themes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our model shows key elements that are specific to SDM with older adults. Further research needs to focus on how to educate HCPs on the competencies needed to engage in SDM with older patients, and how to implement the model into everyday practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychooncology Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / PSICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychooncology Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / PSICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda