Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Brepocitinib, Zimlovisertib, and Ropsacitinib in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.
Kimball, Alexa B; Peeva, Elena; Forman, Seth; Moiin, Ali; Khattri, Saakshi; Porter, Martina L; Mangold, Aaron R; Ghosh, Pranab; Banfield, Christopher; Oemar, Barry.
Afiliação
  • Kimball AB; Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
  • Peeva E; Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA.
  • Forman S; ForCare Medical Center, Tampa, FL.
  • Moiin A; Revival Research Institute, LLC, Southfield, MI.
  • Khattri S; Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.
  • Porter ML; Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
  • Mangold AR; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ.
  • Ghosh P; Pfizer, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
  • Banfield C; Pfizer, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
  • Oemar B; Pfizer, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
NEJM Evid ; 3(3): EVIDoa2300155, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38335032
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating, inflammatory skin disease with limited treatment options and partially understood pathophysiology. Using an umbrella trial design, three kinase inhibitor immunomodulators with different mechanisms of action were evaluated.

METHODS:

This phase 2a, double-blind, parallel-group trial enrolled adults with moderate to severe HS who were then randomly assigned (1111) to once-daily brepocitinib 45 mg (a JAK1/TYK2 inhibitor), zimlovisertib 400 mg (an IRAK4 inhibitor), ropsacitinib 400 mg (a TYK2 inhibitor), or matching placebo for 16 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of participants achieving HS clinical response (HiSCR) at week 16. Safety, including treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), was monitored throughout.

RESULTS:

Totals of 52, 47, 47, and 48 participants were assigned to brepocitinib, zimlovisertib, ropsacitinib, and placebo, respectively. At week 16, 28% were lost to follow-up and assumed to be nonresponders; HiSCR occurred in 33.3% (16/48) of participants receiving placebo and in 51.9% (27/52), 34.0% (16/47), and 37.0% (17/46) of those receiving brepocitinib, zimlovisertib, and ropsacitinib (difference in percentage points vs. placebo [90% confidence interval], 18.7 [2.7 to 34.6], 0.7 [−15.2 to 16.7], and 3.5 [−12.6 to 19.6]), respectively. TEAEs occurred more frequently with active treatment (brepocitinib, 30 [57.7%]; zimlovisertib, 26 [55.3%]; ropsacitinib, 29 [61.7%]; placebo, 23 [47.9%]). Most TEAEs (infections, skin disorders, and gastrointestinal symptoms) were mild; there were no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS:

Participants with moderate to severe HS treated with brepocitinib experienced greater clinical response, whereas those on zimlovisertib and ropsacitinib did not, compared with placebo. These results favor the JAK/STAT pathway as an immunologic target in HS and did not confirm a role for selective IRAK4 or TYK2 inhibition. These results should be confirmed in larger studies with longer follow-up. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov registration number, NCT04092452.)
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pirazinas / Pirazóis / Hidradenite Supurativa Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: NEJM Evid Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pirazinas / Pirazóis / Hidradenite Supurativa Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: NEJM Evid Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article