Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictive Criterion Validity of the Parsley Symptom Index Against the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-10 in a Chronic Disease Cohort: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Williams, Hants; Steinberg, Sarah; Leon, Kendall; Vingum, Ryan; Hu, Mengyao; Berzin, Robin; Hagg, Heather; Hanaway, Patrick.
Afiliação
  • Williams H; Applied Health Informatics, School of Health Professions, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
  • Steinberg S; Parsley Health, New York, NY, United States.
  • Leon K; Untold Content, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
  • Vingum R; Untold Content, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
  • Hu M; Applied Health Informatics, School of Health Professions, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
  • Berzin R; Parsley Health, New York, NY, United States.
  • Hagg H; Parsley Health, New York, NY, United States.
  • Hanaway P; Family to Family, Weaverville, NC, United States.
JMIR Form Res ; 8: e53316, 2024 Feb 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38363587
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Approximately 60% of US adults live with chronic disease, imposing a significant burden on patients and the health care system. With the rise of telehealth, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) have emerged as pivotal tools for managing chronic disease. While numerous PROMs exist, few have been designed explicitly for telehealth settings. The Parsley Symptom Index (PSI) is an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) developed specifically for telehealth environments.

OBJECTIVE:

Our aim is to determine whether the PSI predicts changes in the established Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-10 (PROMIS-10) Global Health, a 10-question short form.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from 367 unique patients, amassing 1170 observations between August 30, 2017, and January 30, 2023. Patients completed the PSI and the PROMIS-10 multiple times throughout the study period. Using univariate regression models, we assess the predictive criterion validity of the PSI against PROMIS-10 scores.

RESULTS:

This study revealed significant relationships between the PSI and PROMIS-10 physical and mental health scores through comprehensive univariate analyses, thus establishing support for the criterion validity of the PSI. These analyses highlighted the PSI's potential as an insightful tool for understanding and predicting both mental and physical health dimensions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings emphasize the importance of the PSI in capturing the nuanced interactions between symptomatology and health outcomes. These insights reinforce the value of the PSI in clinical contexts and support its potential as a versatile tool in both research and practice.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: JMIR Form Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: JMIR Form Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos