Embolization of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure devices: Timing, management and clinical outcomes.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med
; 64: 7-14, 2024 Jul.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38448258
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder embolization is an infrequent but serious complication.OBJECTIVES:
We aim to describe timing, management and clinical outcomes of device embolization in a multi-center registry.METHODS:
Patient characteristics, imaging findings and procedure and follow-up data were collected retrospectively. Device embolizations were categorized according to 1) timing 2) management and 3) clinical outcomes.RESULTS:
Sixty-seven centers contributed data. Device embolization occurred in 108 patients. In 70.4 % of cases, it happened within the first 24 h of the procedure. The device was purposefully left in the LA and the aorta in two (1.9 %) patients, an initial percutaneous retrieval was attempted in 81 (75.0 %) and surgery without prior percutaneous retrieval attempt was performed in 23 (21.3 %) patients. Two patients died before a retrieval attempt could be made. In 28/81 (34.6 %) patients with an initial percutaneous retrieval attempt a second, additional attempt was performed, which was associated with a high mortality (death in patients with one attempt 2.9 % vs. second attempt 21.4 %, p < 0.001). The primary outcome (bailout surgery, cardiogenic shock, stroke, TIA, and/or death) occurred in 47 (43.5 %) patients. Other major complications related to device embolization occurred in 21 (19.4 %) patients.CONCLUSIONS:
The majority of device embolizations after LAA closure occurs early. A percutaneous approach is often the preferred method for a first rescue attempt. Major adverse event rates, including death, are high particularly if the first retrieval attempt was unsuccessful. CONDENSED ABSTRACT This dedicated multicenter registry examined timing, management, and clinical outcome of device embolization. Early embolization (70.4 %) was most frequent. As a first rescue attempt, percutaneous retrieval was preferred in 75.0 %, followed by surgical removal (21.3 %). In patients with a second retrieval attempt a higher mortality (death first attempt 2.9 % vs. death second attempt 24.1 %, p < 0.001) was observed. Mortality (10.2 %) and the major complication rate after device embolization were high.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Fibrilação Atrial
/
Cateterismo Cardíaco
/
Sistema de Registros
/
Apêndice Atrial
/
Remoção de Dispositivo
Limite:
Aged
/
Aged80
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Cardiovasc Revasc Med
Assunto da revista:
ANGIOLOGIA
/
CARDIOLOGIA
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Alemanha