Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of Late-Line Systemic Treatment in GIST: Does Sequence Matter?
Thirasastr, Prapassorn; Sutton, Thomas L; Joseph, Cissimol P; Lin, Heather; Amini, Behrang; Mayo, Skye C; Araujo, Dejka; Benjamin, Robert S; Conley, Anthony P; Livingston, John A; Ludwig, Joseph; Patel, Shreyaskumar; Ratan, Ravin; Ravi, Vinod; Zarzour, Maria A; Nassif Haddad, Elise F; Nakazawa, Michael S; Zhou, Xiao; Heinrich, Michael C; Somaiah, Neeta.
Afiliação
  • Thirasastr P; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Sutton TL; Division of Surgical Oncology, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
  • Joseph CP; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Lin H; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Amini B; Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Mayo SC; Division of Surgical Oncology, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
  • Araujo D; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Benjamin RS; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Conley AP; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Livingston JA; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Ludwig J; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Patel S; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Ratan R; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Ravi V; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Zarzour MA; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Nassif Haddad EF; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Nakazawa MS; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Zhou X; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Heinrich MC; Cell and Developmental Biology, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
  • Somaiah N; Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(5)2024 Feb 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38473266
ABSTRACT
Ripretinib and avapritinib have demonstrated activity in the late-line treatment of gastrointestinal stomal tumors (GISTs). We investigated whether patients previously treated with ripretinib benefit from avapritinib, and vice versa. Patients diagnosed with metastatic/unresectable GIST and treated with both drugs at two institutions in 2000-2021 were included. Patients were grouped by drug sequence ripretinib-avapritinib (RA) or avapritinib-ripretinib (AR). Radiographic response was evaluated using RECIST 1.1. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to compare time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Thirty-four patients (17 per group) were identified, with a median age of 48 years. The most common primary site was the small bowel (17/34, 50%), followed by the stomach (10/34, 29.4%). Baseline characteristics and tumor mutations were not significantly different between groups. Response rates (RRs) for ripretinib were 18% for RA and 12% for AR; RRs for avapritinib were 12% for AR and 18% for RA. Median TTPs for ripretinib were 3.65 months (95%CI 2-5.95) for RA and 4.73 months (1.87-15.84) for AR. Median TTPs for avapritinib were 5.39 months (2.86-18.99) for AR and 4.11 months (1.91-11.4) for RA. Median OS rates following RA or AR initiation were 29.63 (95%CI 13.8-50.53) and 33.7 (20.03-50.57) months, respectively. Both ripretinib and avapritinib were efficacious in the late-line treatment of GIST, with no evidence that efficacy depended on sequencing.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos