Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of national interventions and policies to optimize antibiotic use in healthcare settings in England.
Knowles, Rebecca; Chandler, Clare; O'Neill, Stephen; Sharland, Mike; Mays, Nicholas.
Afiliação
  • Knowles R; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Chandler C; Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • O'Neill S; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Sharland M; Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
  • Mays N; Paediatric Infectious Diseases Department, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 79(6): 1234-1247, 2024 Jun 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507232
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To identify and assess the effectiveness of national antibiotic optimization interventions in primary and secondary care in England (2013-2022).

METHODS:

A systematic scoping review was conducted. Literature databases (Embase and Medline) were used to identify interventions and evaluations. Reports included the UK AMR Strategy (2013-2018), National Action Plan (2019-2024) and English Surveillance Programme for Antimicrobial Utilisation and Resistance (ESPAUR) reports (2014-2022). The design, focus and quality of evaluations and the interventions' effectiveness were extracted.

FINDINGS:

Four hundred and seventy-seven peer-reviewed studies and 13 reports were screened. One hundred and three studies were included for review, identifying 109 interventions in eight categories policy and commissioning (n = 9); classifications (n = 1); guidance and toolkits (n = 22); monitoring and feedback (n = 17); professional engagement and training (n = 19); prescriber tools (n = 12); public awareness (n = 17); workforce and governance (n = 12).Most interventions lack high-quality effectiveness evidence. Evaluations mainly focused on clinical, microbiological or antibiotic use outcomes, or intervention implementation, often assessing how interventions were perceived to affect behaviour. Only 16 interventions had studies that quantified effects on prescribing, of which six reported reductions. The largest reduction was reported with structural-level interventions and attributed to a policy and commissioning intervention (primary care financial incentives). Behavioural interventions (guidance and toolkits) reported the greatest impact in hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS:

Many interventions have targeted antibiotic use, each pulling different levers across the health system simultaneously. On the basis of these studies, structural-level interventions may have the greatest impact. Collectively, the combination of interventions may explain England's decline in prescribing but direct evidence of causality is unavailable.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gestão de Antimicrobianos / Política de Saúde / Antibacterianos Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Antimicrob Chemother Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gestão de Antimicrobianos / Política de Saúde / Antibacterianos Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Antimicrob Chemother Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido