Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A retrospective study of the detection of sepsis pathogens comparing blood culture and culture-independent digital PCR.
Zhao, Zhijun; Wang, Yixuan; Kang, Yuting; Wu, Geng; He, Jing; Wang, Zhanying; Yang, Ju; Wang, Yaqi; Yang, Xiaojun; Jia, Wei.
Afiliação
  • Zhao Z; Medical Laboratory Center, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
  • Wang Y; Ningxia Key Laboratory of Clinical Pathogenic Microorganisms, Yinchuan, China.
  • Kang Y; School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
  • Wu G; Ningxia Key Laboratory of Clinical Pathogenic Microorganisms, Yinchuan, China.
  • He J; Ningxia Key Laboratory of Clinical Pathogenic Microorganisms, Yinchuan, China.
  • Wang Z; School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
  • Yang J; Department of Research and Development, Rainsure Scientific Co. Ltd., Suzhou, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Research and Development, Rainsure Scientific Co. Ltd., Suzhou, China.
  • Yang X; Department of Research and Development, Rainsure Scientific Co. Ltd., Suzhou, China.
  • Jia W; Department of Research and Development, Rainsure Scientific Co. Ltd., Suzhou, China.
Heliyon ; 10(6): e27523, 2024 Mar 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38510040
ABSTRACT
Fast and precise identification of microorganisms in the early diagnosis of sepsis is crucial for enhancing patient outcomes. Digital PCR (dPCR) is a highly sensitive approach for absolute quantification that can be utilized as a culture-independent molecular technique for diagnosing sepsis pathogens. We performed a retrospective investigation on 69 ICU patients suspected of sepsis. Our findings showed that a multiplex dPCR diagnostic kit outperformed blood culture in detecting the 15 most frequent bacteria that cause sepsis. Ninety-two bacterial strains were identified using dPCR at concentrations varying from 34 copies/mL to 105,800 copies/mL. The detection rate of dPCR was much greater than that of BC, with 27.53% (19/69) versus 73.91% (51/69). The sensitivity of dPCR was 63.2%. Our research indicated that dPCR outperforms blood culture in the early detection of sepsis-causing microorganisms. The diagnostic kit can detect a greater variety of pathogens with quantitative data, including polymicrobial infections, and has a quicker processing time. DPCR is a valuable technique that could aid in the proper management of sepsis.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China