Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MRI Safety of Stapes Prostheses: A Systematic Review.
Daher, Ghazal S; Kocharyan, Armine; Carlson, Matthew L; Dillon, William P; Fischbein, Nancy J; Jackler, Robert; Rassner, Ulrich; Gurgel, Richard K.
Afiliação
  • Daher GS; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Kocharyan A; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Carlson ML; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Dillon WP; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.
  • Fischbein NJ; Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine.
  • Jackler R; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Rassner U; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Gurgel RK; Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(5): 469-474, 2024 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38518765
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety of stapes prostheses. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to November 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. REVIEW

METHODS:

Studies reporting evidence of stapes prosthesis displacement or interaction in adult or pediatric implant recipients undergoing MRI. Cadaveric, animal, and basic studies with nonhuman data were also included.

RESULTS:

From an initial search of 123 articles, 42 full-text studies were evaluated for eligibility and 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. Motion artifact was reported in a few stainless steel prosthesis types in vitro; however, such displacement was not observed in human cadaver temporal bone studies and had no adverse reported outcomes. A small subgroup of patients in the 1980s received a ferromagnetic stainless steel stapes implant that was recalled and has not been used since 1987. Patients with implants performed in the 1980s should be directed to 1.5T scanners from an abundance of caution.

CONCLUSION:

Modern (post-1987) stapes prostheses do not pose a risk in vivo when exposed to the magnetic fields of MRI scanners.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgia do Estribo / Prótese Ossicular / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Otol Neurotol Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgia do Estribo / Prótese Ossicular / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Otol Neurotol Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article