Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting ambient PM2.5 concentrations via time series models in Anhui Province, China.
Hasnain, Ahmad; Hashmi, Muhammad Zaffar; Khan, Sohaib; Bhatti, Uzair Aslam; Min, Xiangqiang; Yue, Yin; He, Yufeng; Wei, Geng.
Afiliação
  • Hasnain A; Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
  • Hashmi MZ; Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Khan S; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University 1449 Engineering Research, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA.
  • Bhatti UA; Department of Environmental Health, Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Min X; School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China.
  • Yue Y; School of Information and Communication Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, China. uzair@hainanu.edu.cn.
  • He Y; School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China.
  • Wei G; Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, College of Geography and Remote Sensing Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, China.
Environ Monit Assess ; 196(5): 487, 2024 Apr 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687422
ABSTRACT
Due to rapid expansion in the global economy and industrialization, PM2.5 (particles smaller than 2.5 µm in aerodynamic diameter) pollution has become a key environmental issue. The public health and social development directly affected by high PM2.5 levels. In this paper, ambient PM2.5 concentrations along with meteorological data are forecasted using time series models, including random forest (RF), prophet forecasting model (PFM), and autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) in Anhui province, China. The results indicate that the RF model outperformed the PFM and ARIMA in the prediction of PM2.5 concentrations, with cross-validation coefficients of determination R2, RMSE, and MAE values of 0.83, 10.39 µg/m3, and 6.83 µg/m3, respectively. PFM achieved the average results (R2 = 0.71, RMSE = 13.90 µg/m3, and MAE = 9.05 µg/m3), while the predicted results by ARIMA are comparatively poorer (R2 = 0.64, RMSE = 15.85 µg/m3, and MAE = 10.59 µg/m3) than RF and PFM. These findings reveal that the RF model is the most effective method for predicting PM2.5 and can be applied to other regions for new findings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monitoramento Ambiental / Poluentes Atmosféricos / Poluição do Ar / Material Particulado País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Environ Monit Assess Assunto da revista: SAUDE AMBIENTAL Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monitoramento Ambiental / Poluentes Atmosféricos / Poluição do Ar / Material Particulado País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Environ Monit Assess Assunto da revista: SAUDE AMBIENTAL Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China