Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer: Improving treatment delivery efficiency and accuracy.
Mastella, Edoardo; Epile, Joel E; De Guglielmo, Eleonora; Fabbri, Sara; Calderoni, Francesca; Manco, Luigi; Szilagyi, Klarisa E; Malorgio, Antonio; Turra, Alessandro; Stefanelli, Antonio.
Afiliação
  • Mastella E; Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
  • Epile JE; Master of Advanced Studies in Medical Physics, International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Strada Costiera 11, I-34151 Trieste, Italy.
  • De Guglielmo E; Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
  • Fabbri S; Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
  • Calderoni F; Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
  • Manco L; Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
  • Szilagyi KE; Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL di Ferrara, via Cassoli 30, I-44121 Ferrara, Italy.
  • Malorgio A; Specialization School of Medical Physics, University of Bologna, Viale Berti-Pichat 6/2, I-40127 Bologna, Italy.
  • Turra A; Radiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
  • Stefanelli A; Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, via A. Moro 8, I-44124 Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38746647
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

In stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer, intrafraction motion is an important source of treatment uncertainty as it could not be completely smoothed through fractionation. Herein, we compared different arrangements and beam qualities for extreme hypofractionated treatments to minimize beam delivery time and so intrafractional errors.

Methods:

A retrospective dataset of 11 patients was used. Three volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) beam arrangements were compared for a prescription dose of 40 Gy/5 fractions two full arcs, 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF); one full arc, 6 MV FFF; one full arc, 10 MV FFF. A plan quality index was defined to compare achievement of the planning goals. Plan complexity was evaluated with the modulation factor. Dose delivery accuracy and efficiency were measured with patient-specific quality assurance plans.

Results:

All treatment plans fulfilled all dose objectives. No statistical differences were found both in plan quality and complexity. Very accurate dose delivery was achieved with the three arrangements, with mean γ passing rates >96.5 % (2 %/2 mm criteria). Slightly but significantly higher γ passing rates were observed with single-arc 6 MV FFF. Contrariwise, statistically significant reductions of the delivery time were obtained with single-arc geometries the average delivery times were 1.6 min (-46.1 %) and 1.3 min (-56.2 %) for 6 and 10 MV FFF respectively.

Conclusions:

The high-quality, very fast and accurate dose delivery of single-arc plans confirmed the suitability of this arrangement for prostate SBRT. In particular, the significant reduction of delivery time would improve treatment robustness against intrafraction prostate motion.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália