Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Detailed characterization and impact of small airway dysfunction in school-age asthma.
Kjellberg, Sanna; Olin, Anna-Carin; Schiöler, Linus; Robinson, Paul D.
Afiliação
  • Kjellberg S; Department of Pediatrics, Skaraborg Central Hospital, Skövde, Sweden.
  • Olin AC; Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Schiöler L; Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Robinson PD; Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Asthma ; : 1-10, 2024 May 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747533
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Small airway dysfunction (SAD) is increasingly recognized as an important feature of pediatric asthma yet typically relies on spirometry-derived FEF25-75 to detect its presence. Multiple breath washout (MBW) and oscillometry potentially offer improved sensitivity for SAD detection, but their utility in comparison to FEF25-75, and correlations with clinical outcomes remains unclear for school-age asthma. We investigated SAD occurrence using these techniques, between-test correlation and links to clinical outcomes in 57 asthmatic children aged 8-18 years.

METHODS:

MBW and spirometry abnormality were defined as z-scores above/below ± 1.96, generating MBW reference equations from contemporaneous controls (n = 69). Abnormal oscillometry was defined as > 97.5th percentile, also from contemporaneous controls (n = 146). Individuals with abnormal FEF25-75, MBW, or oscillometry were considered to have SAD.

RESULTS:

Using these limits of normal, SAD was present on oscillometry in 63% (resistance at 5-20 Hz; R5-R20; >97.5th percentile), on MBW in 54% (Scond; z-scores> +1.96) and in spirometry FEF25-75 in 44% of participants (z-scores< -1.96). SAD, defined by oscillometry and/or MBW abnormality, occurred in 77%. Among those with abnormal R5-R20, Scond was abnormal in 71%. Correlations indicated both R5-R20 and Scond were linked to asthma medication burden, baseline FEV1 and reversibility. Additionally, Scond correlated with FENO and magnitude of bronchial hyper-responsiveness. SAD, detected by oscillometry and/or MBW, occurred in almost 80% of school-aged asthmatic children, surpassing FEF25-75 detection rates.

CONCLUSIONS:

Discordant oscillometry and MBW abnormality suggests they reflect different aspects of SAD, serving as complementary tools. Key asthma clinical features, like reversibility, had stronger correlation with MBW-derived Scond than oscillometry-derived R5-R20.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Asthma Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Asthma Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia