Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The association between pre-diagnostic levels of psychological distress and adverse effects after radical prostatectomy.
Nilsson, Rasmus; Næss-Andresen, Thomas; Myklebust, Tor Åge; Bernklev, Tomm; Kersten, Hege; Haug, Erik Skaaheim.
Afiliação
  • Nilsson R; Department of Urology Telemark Hospital Trust Skien Norway.
  • Næss-Andresen T; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
  • Myklebust TÅ; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Drammen Norway.
  • Bernklev T; Department of Registration Cancer Registry Norway Oslo Norway.
  • Kersten H; Department of Research and Innovation Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust Ålesund Norway.
  • Haug ES; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
BJUI Compass ; 5(5): 502-511, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751947
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To prospectively analyse the associations between pre-diagnostic levels of anxiety and depression and patient-reported urinary and sexual adverse effects after radical prostatectomy in a population-based setting. Patients and

Methods:

In three Norwegian county hospitals, men referred with a suspicion of prostate cancer were asked to fill out a patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) questionnaire prior to prostate biopsy. Those who later underwent radical prostatectomy were stratified into three distress groups according to their Hopkins Symptom Checklist 5-score. Additional PROM questionnaires, including the EPIC-26 to measure adverse effects, were collected at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Multivariable mixed models were estimated and post hoc pairwise comparisons performed to explore differences in adverse effects between distress groups.

Results:

A total of 416 men were included at baseline and of those, 365 (88%) returned questionnaires at 6 months and 360 (87%) at 12 months. After adjusting for confounders, men with high distress at baseline had worse urinary incontinence domain score (58.9 vs. 66.8, p = 0.028), more urinary bother (64.7 vs. 73.6, p = 0.04) and a higher risk of using incontinence pads (70.6% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.034) at 6 months than those with low distress. There was no difference in the sexual domain scores between distress groups postoperatively, but the high-distress group expressed more sexual bother (24.9 vs. 37.5, p = 0.015) and the intermediate-distress group had a greater probability of using sexual medications or devices (63.8% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.015) than the low-distress group at 6 months. At 12 months scores generally improved slightly and differences between distress groups were less evident.

Conclusion:

Men with higher levels of anxiety and depression before prostate biopsy report more urinary and sexual adverse effects after radical prostatectomy. This should be considered both in treatment decision-making and during follow-up after radical prostatectomy.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: BJUI Compass Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: BJUI Compass Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article