Effects of spinal mobilization on physical function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify, critically appraise, and synthesize current evidence regarding the effects of spinal mobilization on physical function in patients with stroke. Three databases, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, were searched from inception to March 15, 2024. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of spinal mobilization to conventional therapy were eligible for inclusion. Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the effects of spinal mobilization. Nine randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 294 patients with stroke. All included studies were evaluated as good or above for quality assessment. No adverse events related to spinal mobilization were reported. Compared to conventional therapy, spinal mobilization demonstrated significantly improved forward head posture (SMD 1.00, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.46, p < 0.001); there were no between-group differences on forced vital capacity (SMD 0.44, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.88, p = 0.06), forced expiratory volume (SMD 0.33, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.77, p = 0.15), balance (SMD 0.36, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.77, p = 0.08), gait speed (SMD 0.48, 95% CI -0.44 to 1.40, p = 0.31), and trunk function (SMD 0.79, 95% CI -0.17 to 1.75, p = 0.11). Cervical mobilization significantly improved forward head posture; however, no significant differences were found in other outcomes. Clinicians may consider spinal mobilization as an adjunctive intervention in stroke rehabilitation to address posture-related impairments to expand treatment strategy and optimize quality of care.