Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Results from randomized trial of pirfenidone in patients with chronic rejection (STOP-CLAD study).
Combs, Michael P; Belloli, Elizabeth A; Gargurevich, Nicolas; Flaherty, Kevin R; Murray, Susan; Galbán, Craig J; Lama, Vibha N.
Afiliação
  • Combs MP; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Belloli EA; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Gargurevich N; School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Flaherty KR; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Murray S; School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Galbán CJ; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Lama VN; Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: vibha.n.lama@emory.edu.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796045
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading long-term cause of poor outcomes after transplant and manifests by fibrotic remodeling of small airways and/or pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis. This study evaluated the effect of pirfenidone on quantitative radiographic and pulmonary function assessment in patients with CLAD.

METHODS:

We performed a single-center, 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of pirfenidone in patients with CLAD. Randomization was stratified by CLAD phenotype. The primary outcome for this study was change in radiographic assessment of small airways disease, quantified as percentage of lung volume using parametric response mapping analysis of computed tomography scans (PRMfSAD); secondary outcomes included change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), change in forced vital capacity (FVC), and change in radiographic quantification of parenchymal disease (PRMPD). Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the treatment effect on outcome measures.

RESULTS:

The goal enrollment of 60 patients was not met due to the coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic, with 23 patients included in the analysis. There was no significant difference over the study period between the pirfenidone vs placebo groups with regards to the observed change in PRMfSAD (+4.2% vs -0.4%; p = 0.22), FEV1 (-3.5% vs -3.6%; p = 0.97), FVC (-1.9% vs -4.6%; p = 0.41), or PRMPD (-0.6% vs -2.5%; p = 0.30). The study treatment tolerance and adverse events were generally similar between the pirfenidone and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pirfenidone had no apparent impact on radiographic evidence of allograft dysfunction or pulmonary function decline in a single-center randomized trial of CLAD patients that did not meet enrollment goals but had an acceptable tolerance and side-effect profile.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Heart Lung Transplant Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Heart Lung Transplant Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article