Association of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Valsartan With Blood Pressure Changes and Symptomatic Hypotension: the PARAGLIDE-HF Trial.
J Card Fail
; 2024 May 26.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38802053
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
In PARAGLIDE-HF, in patients with ejection fraction (EF) > 40%, stabilized after worsening heart failure (WHF), sacubitril/valsartan led to greater reduction in plasma NT-proBNP levels and was associated with clinical benefit compared to valsartan alone, despite more symptomatic hypotension (SH). Concern about SH may be limiting the use of sacubitril/valsartan in appropriate patients.METHODS:
We characterized patients by the occurrence of SH (investigator-reported) after randomization to either sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan. A key trial inclusion criterion was systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 100 mmHg for the preceding 6 hours and no SH. We also compared outcomes based on baseline SBP stratified by the median blood pressure. The primary endpoint was time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP levels from baseline through weeks 4 and 8. A secondary hierarchical outcome (win ratio) consisted of (1) cardiovascular death; (2) hospitalizations due to HF; (3) urgent HF visits; and (4) change in NT-proBNP levels.RESULTS:
Among 466 randomized patients, 92 (19.7%) experienced SH (sacubitril/valsartan, nâ¯=â¯56 [24.0%]; valsartan, nâ¯=â¯36 [15.5%]; Pâ¯=â¯0.020). The median time to the first SH event was similar between treatment arms (18 days vs 15 days, respectively; Pâ¯=â¯0.42) as was the proportion of first SH events classified as serious by investigators. Patients who experienced SH with sacubitril/valsartan were more likely to be white (OR 1.87 [95% CI 0.31, 11.15]), to have a lower baseline SBP (per 10 mmHg increase, OR 0.68 [95% CI 0.55, 0.85]), or to have a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of > 60% (OR 2.21 [95% CI 1.05, 4.65]). Time-averaged change in NT-proBNP levels did not differ between patients with baseline SBP ≥ 128 mmHg vs SBP < 128 mmHg (interaction, Pâ¯=â¯0.43). The composite hierarchical outcome for sacubitril/valsartan in patients with baseline SBP ≥ 128 mmHg had a win ratio of 1.34 ([95% CI 0.91, 1.99]; Pâ¯=â¯0.096) vs SBP < 128 mmHg with a win ratio of 1.09 ([95%CI 0.73, 1.66]; Pâ¯=â¯0 .62; interaction P valueâ¯=â¯0.42).CONCLUSION:
Among patients with LVEF > 40% stabilized after WHF, incident SH was more common with sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan. SH was associated with lower baseline SBP, being white, and having higher LVEF. Treatment benefits with sacubitril/valsartan may be more pronounced in patients with higher baseline SBP and lower LVEF (≤ 60%). (Funded by Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03988634.).
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Card Fail
Assunto da revista:
CARDIOLOGIA
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article