Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Worth the Risk? Standardized Screening to Identify Substance Use Among Patients Prior to Surgery.
Cooley, Samantha; Bicket, Mark C; Mohammed, Hanan; Lai, Yenling; Evilsizer, Sarah; Brummett, Chad M; Waljee, Jennifer F.
Afiliação
  • Cooley S; Kansas City University, Kansas City, MO 64106, United States.
  • Bicket MC; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
  • Mohammed H; Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
  • Lai Y; Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
  • Evilsizer S; Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
  • Brummett CM; Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
  • Waljee JF; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Ann Surg ; 2024 May 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814073
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

We sought to compare identification of unhealthy substance use before surgery using The Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription Medication, and Other Substance Use (TAPS), a standardized 4-item instrument, versus routine clinical documentation in the electronic medical record (EHR). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Over 20% of individuals exhibit unhealthy substance use before elective surgery. Routine EHR documentation is often based on non-standard questions that may not fully capture the extent of substance use and is subject to bias. In contrast, brief standardized screening could provide a more efficient and systematic approach.

METHODS:

We conducted a cross-sectional study among adults (≥18 y) at a preoperative clinic from August to September, 2021. Positive screens for unhealthy substances by TAPS were compared to data from the EHR. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were reported. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were used to assess diagnostic ability. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the predictors of positive screens by TAPS.

RESULTS:

The cohort included 240 surgical patients. TAPS screening identified significantly more positive screens than EHR documentation (43.3% vs. 14.2%). Patients with unhealthy substance use were younger (50.8 vs. 56.7 y; P=0.003), and TAPS revealed alcohol misuse in 30.8% of cases, contrasting with 0% in clinician documentation (P<0.001). Of the 104 TAPS-positive patients, 69.2% were missed by EHR documentation. Sensitivity (31%) and accuracy (AUC=0.65) of clinician documentation for any unhealthy substance use were lower compared to TAPS.

CONCLUSION:

Standardized TAPS screening detected preoperative unhealthy substance use more frequently than routine clinician documentation, emphasizing the need for integrating standardized measures into surgical practice to ensure safer perioperative care and outcomes.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos