Enhancing reporting through structure: a before and after study on the effectiveness of SPIRIT-based templates to improve the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trial protocols.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the improvements in the completeness of reporting of randomized trial protocols after the publication of the Standard Protocol Items Recommendations for Interventional Trial (SPIRIT) guidelines, many items remain poorly reported. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of using SPIRIT-tailored templates for trial protocols to improve the completeness of reporting of the protocols that master's students write as part of their master's theses. METHODS: Before and after experimental study performed at the University Master's Degree in Orthopaedic Manual Physiotherapy of the Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (Barcelona, Spain). While students in the post-intervention period were instructed to use a trial protocol template that was tailored to SPIRIT, students in the pre-intervention period did not use the template. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Difference between the pre- and post-intervention periods in the mean number of adequately reported items (0-10 scale). The outcomes were evaluated independently and in duplicate by two blinded assessors. Students and their supervisors were not aware that they were part of a research project. For the statistical analysis, we used a generalized linear regression model (dependent variable number of adequately reported items in the protocol; independent variables intervention period, call, language). RESULTS: Thirty-four trial protocols were included (17, pre-intervention; 17, post-intervention). Protocols produced during the post-intervention period (mean 8.24; SD 1.52) were more completely reported than those produced during the pre-intervention period (mean 6.35; SD 1.80); adjusted difference 1.79 (95% CI 0.58 to 3.00). CONCLUSIONS: SPIRIT-based templates could be used to improve the completeness of reporting of randomized trial protocols.