Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cashing in: cost-benefit analysis framework for digital hospitals.
Nguyen, Kim-Huong; Comans, Tracy; Nguyen, Thi Thao; Simpson, Digby; Woods, Leanna; Wright, Chad; Green, Damian; McNeil, Keith; Sullivan, Clair.
Afiliação
  • Nguyen KH; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Comans T; Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Nguyen TT; Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Simpson D; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Woods L; National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Wright C; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. thao.nguyen@uq.edu.au.
  • Green D; School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. thao.nguyen@uq.edu.au.
  • McNeil K; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Sullivan C; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 694, 2024 May 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822341
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

For many countries, especially those outside the USA without incentive payments, implementing and maintaining electronic medical records (EMR) is expensive and can be controversial given the large amounts of investment. Evaluating the value of EMR implementation is necessary to understand whether or not, such investment, especially when it comes from the public source, is an efficient allocation of healthcare resources. Nonetheless, most countries have struggled to measure the return on EMR investment due to the lack of appropriate evaluation frameworks.

METHODS:

This paper outlines the development of an evidence-based digital health cost-benefit analysis (eHealth-CBA) framework to calculate the total economic value of the EMR implementation over time. A net positive benefit indicates such investment represents improved efficiency, and a net negative is considered a wasteful use of public resources.

RESULTS:

We developed a three-stage process that takes into account the complexity of the healthcare system and its stakeholders, the investment appraisal and evaluation practice, and the existing knowledge of EMR implementation. The three stages include (1) literature review, (2) stakeholder consultation, and (3) CBA framework development. The framework maps the impacts of the EMR to the quadruple aim of healthcare and clearly creates a method for value assessment.

CONCLUSIONS:

The proposed framework is the first step toward developing a comprehensive evaluation framework for EMRs to inform health decision-makers about the economic value of digital investments rather than just the financial value.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Custo-Benefício / Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Custo-Benefício / Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália