Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systems for electronic documentation and sharing of advance care planning preferences: a scoping review.
Çevik, Hüsna Sarica; Muente, Catharina; Muehlensiepen, Felix; Birtwistle, Jacqueline; Pachanov, Alexander; Pieper, Dawid; Allsop, Matthew J.
Afiliação
  • Çevik HS; Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Muente C; Department of Family Medicine, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Muehlensiepen F; Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Institute for Health Services and Health System Research, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
  • Birtwistle J; Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Rüdersdorf, Germany.
  • Pachanov A; Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Institute for Health Services and Health System Research, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
  • Pieper D; Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Rüdersdorf, Germany.
  • Allsop MJ; Evidence Based Practice in Brandenburg: A JBI Affiliated Group, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Prog Palliat Care ; 32(3): 149-159, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831759
ABSTRACT
Digital approaches to support advance care planning (ACP) documentation and sharing are increasingly being used, with a lack of research to characterise their design, content, and use. This study aimed to characterise how digital approaches are being used to support ACP documentation and sharing internationally. A scoping review was performed in accordance with the JBI (formerly Joanna Briggs Institute) guidelines and the PRISMA 2020 checklist, prospectively registered on Open Science Framework (https//osf.io/xnrg3). MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ACM Digital, IEEE Xplore and CINAHL were searched in February 2023. Only publications in English, published from 2008 onwards were considered. Eligibility criteria included a focus on ACP and electronic systems. Out of 2,393 records, 34 reports were included, predominantly from the USA (76.5%). ACP documentation is typically stored in electronic health records (EHRs) (67.6%), with a third (32.4%) enabling limited patient access. Non-standard approaches (n = 15;44.1%) were the commonest study design of included reports, with outcome measures focusing on the influence of systems on the documentation (i.e. creation, quantity, quality, frequency or timing) of ACP information (n = 23;67.6%). Digital approaches to support ACP are being implemented and researched internationally with an evidence base dominated by non-standard study designs. Future research is needed to extend outcome measurement to consider aspects of care quality and explore whether the content of existing systems aligns with aspects of care that are valued by patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Prog Palliat Care Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Prog Palliat Care Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido