Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Model-Informed Development of a Cost-Saving Dosing Regimen for Sacituzumab Govitecan.
Moes, Dirk J A R; Hendrikx, Jeroen J M A; Guchelaar, Henk-Jan; Mathijssen, Ron H J; Bakker, J L; Dezentjé, Vincent O; de Rouw, Nikki; van Erp, Nielka P; Smit, Egbert F; van den Heuvel, Michel M; Munnink, Thijs H Oude; van Kats, Maartje; Croes, Sander; Kroep, Judith R; Zwaveling, Juliette; Ter Heine, Rob.
Afiliação
  • Moes DJAR; Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. D.J.A.R.Moes@lumc.nl.
  • Hendrikx JJMA; Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Guchelaar HJ; Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Mathijssen RHJ; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bakker JL; Department of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
  • Dezentjé VO; Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Rouw N; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
  • van Erp NP; Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Smit EF; Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • van den Heuvel MM; Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Munnink THO; Department of Pulmonology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • van Kats M; Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Croes S; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine M. van Kats, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Kroep JR; Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Zwaveling J; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Ter Heine R; Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Target Oncol ; 2024 Jun 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38890221
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The antibody-drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan is approved for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and has shown promising results in various other types of cancer. Its costs may limit patient access to this novel effective treatment modality.

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to develop an evidence-based rational dosing regimen that results in targeted drug exposure within the therapeutic range while minimizing financial toxicity, to improve treatment access. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Exposure equivalent dosing strategies were developed based on pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation by using the published pharmacokinetic model developed by the license holder. The alternative dose was based on the principle of using complete vials to prevent spillage and on the established non-linear relationship between body weight and systemic exposure. Equivalent exposure compared to the approved dosing regimen of 10 mg/kg was aimed for. Equivalent exposure was conservatively defined as calculated geometric mean ratios within the 0.9-1.11 boundaries for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), trough concentration (Ctrough) and maximum concentration (Cmax) of the alternative dosing regimen compared to the approved dosing regimen. Since different vial sizes are available for the European Union (EU) and United States (US) market, because body weight distributions differ between these populations, we performed our analysis for both scenarios.

RESULTS:

Dosing regimens of sacituzumab govitecan for the EU (< 50 kg 400 mg, 50-80 kg 600 mg, and > 80 kg 800 mg) and US population (< 40 kg 360 mg, 40-65 kg 540 mg, 65-90 kg 720 mg, and > 90 kg 900 mg) were developed, based on weight bands. The geometric mean ratios for all pharmacokinetic outcomes were within the predefined equivalence boundaries, while the quantity of drug used was 21.5% and 19.0% lower for the EU and US scenarios, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

With the alternative dosing proposal, an approximately 20% reduction in drug expenses for sacituzumab govitecan can be realized while maintaining an equivalent and more evenly distributed exposure throughout the body weight range, without notable increases in pharmacokinetic variability.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Target Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Target Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda