Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep Learning-Based Automated Imaging Classification of ADPKD.
Kim, Youngwoo; Bu, Seonah; Tao, Cheng; Bae, Kyongtae T.
Afiliação
  • Kim Y; Department of Computer Software Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Republic of Korea.
  • Bu S; Jeju Technology Application Division, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Republic of Korea.
  • Tao C; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Bae KT; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.
Kidney Int Rep ; 9(6): 1802-1809, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38899202
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The Mayo imaging classification model (MICM) requires a prestep qualitative assessment to determine whether a patient is in class 1 (typical) or class 2 (atypical), where patients assigned to class 2 are excluded from the MICM application.

Methods:

We developed a deep learning-based method to automatically classify class 1 and 2 from magnetic resonance (MR) images and provide classification confidence utilizing abdominal T 2 -weighted MR images from 486 subjects, where transfer learning was applied. In addition, the explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) method was illustrated to enhance the explainability of the automated classification results. For performance evaluations, confusion matrices were generated, and receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to measure the area under the curve.

Results:

The proposed method showed excellent performance for the classification of class 1 (97.7%) and 2 (100%), where the combined test accuracy was 98.01%. The precision and recall for predicting class 1 were 1.00 and 0.98, respectively, with F 1 -score of 0.99; whereas those for predicting class 2 were 0.87 and 1.00, respectively, with F 1 -score of 0.93. The weighted averages of precision and recall were 0.98 and 0.98, respectively, showing the classification confidence scores whereas the XAI method well-highlighted contributing regions for the classification.

Conclusion:

The proposed automated method can classify class 1 and 2 cases as accurately as the level of a human expert. This method may be a useful tool to facilitate clinical trials investigating different types of kidney morphology and for clinical management of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Kidney Int Rep Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Kidney Int Rep Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article