Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How much different is the semi-quantification of synovitis according to the ultrasound system and the blood flow detection technology?
Iagnocco, Annamaria; Martínez-Estupiñán, Lina; Figus, Fabiana; Olivas-Vergara, Otto; Zabotti, Alen; Borges, Pablo; Agnes, Cecilia; Zanetti, Anna; Rozza, Davide; Naredo, Esperanza.
Afiliação
  • Iagnocco A; Academic Rheumatology Centre, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin.
  • Martínez-Estupiñán L; Department of Rheumatology, Joint and Bone Research Unit. Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Autónoma University, Madrid.
  • Figus F; Academic Rheumatology Centre, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin.
  • Olivas-Vergara O; Department of Rheumatology, Joint and Bone Research Unit. Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Autónoma University, Madrid.
  • Zabotti A; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, c/o Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine. zabottialen@gmail.com.
  • Borges P; Department of Rheumatology, Joint and Bone Research Unit. Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Autónoma University, Madrid.
  • Agnes C; Ambulatorio di Reumatologia, Dipartimento Area Medica ASL TO5, Turin.
  • Zanetti A; Epidemiology Unit, Italian Society for Rheumatology, Milan.
  • Rozza D; Epidemiology Unit, Italian Society for Rheumatology, Milan.
  • Naredo E; Department of Rheumatology, Joint and Bone Research Unit. Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Autónoma University, Madrid.
Med Ultrason ; 2024 Jun 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38909377
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To compare synovial blood flow scoring between different technologies and ultrasound (US) systems in active and inactive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Fifty-nine RA patients underwent B-mode, power Doppler (PD), colour Doppler (CD), B-Flow and High-Resolution (High-Res) PDI assessments of 6 joints with two US systems at two European centres. Each joint was semi-quantitatively scored for all ultrasound parameters. PD, CD and High-Res PDI synovial signal was also quantitatively scored.

RESULTS:

Correlations between the total score of SH with system 1 and 2 were very high (≥ 0.90, p<0.0001). Baseline correlations between systems for PD and CD total scores were moderate to very high (0.44-0.96, p<0.05). At baseline, there were no significant differences between ultrasound systems for PD or CD semiquantitative-based total scores in active or inactive patients (p>0,05). B-Flow and High-Res total scores were significantly lower than PD or CD total scores (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION:

A high-end and an entry-level US system were interchangeable for scoring SH and showed similar sensitivity and responsiveness in scoring synovial blood flow by PD and CD but not interchangeability. B-Flow and High-Res PDI were responsive, but they showed different sensitivity to detect synovial blood flow compared to conventional Doppler.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Med Ultrason Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Med Ultrason Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article