Arterial stiffness assessment by pulse wave velocity in postmenopausal women: comparison between noninvasive devices.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to ascertain the accuracy of measure arterial stiffness using the HUAWEI GT 3 Pro smartwatch and pOpmètre device against the SphygmoCor (algorithms intersect tangent and maximum of the second derivate). METHODS: Twenty-three physically active postmenopausal women (age 58.9 ± 3.2 years; body mass index 26.3 ± 4.8 kg/m 2 ) were recruited. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, finger-toe pulse wave velocity, and wrist-finger pulse wave velocity were obtained using SphygmoCor, pOpmètre and HUAWEI GT 3 Pro devices in a randomized order. Additionally, the pulse mean carotid-femoral and finger-toe pulse transit time was registered for SphygmoCor and pOpmètre, respectively. RESULTS: Lower values of pulse wave velocity were recorded by HUAWEI in comparison with SphygmoCor with both algorithms, whereas no significant differences were detected between SphygmoCor and pOpmètre results. Pulse wave velocity values from SphygmoCor were positively correlated with pOpmètre results ( r = 0.464 and r = 0.451 using intersect tangent and second derivative algorithms), whereas this was not the case with those obtained from HUAWEI. Coefficients of bias of Lin's concordance coefficients close to 1 (0.832 and 0.831 for intersect tangent and second derivative algorithm, respectively) and mean bias close to 0 from Bland-Altman analysis suggested an acceptable agreement between pulse wave velocity obtained from SphygmoCor and pOpmètre. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest an acceptable concordance of pulse wave velocity values recoded by SphygmoCor and pOpmètre, whereas this was not the case for data obtained from HUAWEI GT 3 Pro smartwatch. Therefore, the pOpmètre may be a viable alternative for assessing arterial stiffness, but measurement via the smartwatch device cannot be recommended.