[Comparison of the Prognostic Value of C-Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio and Glasgow Prognostic Score in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma].

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognostic value of two predictive models based on C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin (ALB), namely the CRP to ALB ratio (CAR) and the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: The data of newly diagnosed DLBCL patients admitted to our center from May 2014 to January 2022 were reviewed. A total of 111 patients who completed at least 4 cycles of R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like chemotherapy with detailed clinical, laboratory data and follow-up information were included. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to evaluate the predictive value of pre-treatment CAR on disease progression and survival. Furthermore, the association between CAR and baseline clinical, laboratory characteristics of patients was evaluated, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between different CAR and GPS subgroups. Finally, the univariate and multivariate COX propor-tional hazard regression models were used to analyze the factors affecting disease outcomes. RESULTS: ROC curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of CAR predicting PFS and OS in DLBCL patients was 0.687 (P =0.002) and 0.695 (P =0.005), respectively, with the optimal cut-off value of 0.11 for both predicting PFS and OS. Compared with the lower CAR (<0.11) group, the higher CAR (≥0.11) group had more clinical risk factors, including age >60 years (P =0.025), ECOG score ≥2 (P =0.004), Lugano stage III-IV (P < 0.001), non-germinal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) subtype (P =0.035), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ( P < 0.001), extranodal involved site >1 (P =0.004) and IPI score >2 (P < 0.001). The interim response evaluation of patients showed that the overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) in the lower CAR group were both significantly better than those in the higher CAR group (ORR 96.9% vs 80.0%, P =0.035; CRR 63.6% vs 32.5%, P =0.008). With a median follow-up of 24 months, patients with lower CAR had significantly longer median PFS and OS than those with higher CAR (median PFS not reached vs 67 months, P =0.0026; median OS not reached vs 67 months, P =0.002), while there was no statistical difference in PFS (P =0.11) and OS (P =0.11) in patients with GPS of 0, 1, and 2. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that only sex (male) and IPI score >2 were independent risk factors for both PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: CAR is significantly correlated with disease progression and survival in DLBCL patients; And compared with GPS, CAR has more advantages in predicting disease outcomes in DLBCL patients.