Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lifestraw Family water filters in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis to define longer-term public health impact against childhood diarrhoea and inform scale-up.
Kerr, Melissa; Cardinale, Vincenzo; De Vito, Corrado; Khanolkar, Amal R.
Afiliação
  • Kerr M; Department of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, England, UK.
  • Cardinale V; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • De Vito C; Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy.
  • Khanolkar AR; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
J Glob Health ; 14: 04018, 2024 Jun 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38939952
ABSTRACT

Background:

Diarrhoeal disease disproportionately affects children <5 years in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The pathogens responsible for diarrhoea are commonly transmitted through faecally-contaminated drinking water. Lifestraw Family point-of-use water filters have been the subject of intervention studies for over a decade and were the first filters evaluated by the World Health Organization in its water treatment evaluation scheme to provide comprehensive protection against many diarrhoea-causing pathogens. This systematic review aimed to 1) report on aspects related to physical environment and implementation and 2) conduct an updated meta-analysis on Lifestraw Family filter effectiveness against childhood diarrhoea based on studies with ≥12 months of follow-up.

Methods:

We conducted a literature search in November 2022 using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria were 1) RCTs, cluster-RCTs, quasi-experimental, or matched cohort studies on 2) Lifestraw Family 1.0 or 2.0 filters 3) conducted in LMICs 4) that evaluated filter effectiveness against diarrhoea in children <5 and 5) analysed ≥12 months of follow-up data on clinical effectiveness against diarrhoea and were 6) published from 2010 with 7) full-text availability in English. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and analysed using a random-effects meta-analysis.

Results:

We included 6 studies in LMICs involving 4740 children <5. Of the four clinically-effective interventions, common characteristics were access to improved water sources (75%), the 2.0 version of the filter or the 1.0 version with additional water storage (100%), use of behaviour change theory, community engagement, and health messaging (75%), local filter repair-and-replace mechanisms (75%), and specially-trained local interventionists (100%). The meta-analysis showed a 30% reduction in diarrhoea risk in the intervention group (RR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.52-0.91, P = 0.01).

Conclusions:

Lifestraw Family water filters can be effective interventions to reduce diarrhoea in vulnerable paediatric populations for at least one year, though certain aspects related to physical environment and implementation may increase their public health impact. The findings of this study suggest considerations for scale-up that can be applied in settings in need of longer-term interim solutions until universal access to safe drinking water is achieved.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Pública / Purificação da Água / Países em Desenvolvimento / Diarreia / Filtração Limite: Child, preschool / Humans / Infant Idioma: En Revista: J Glob Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Pública / Purificação da Água / Países em Desenvolvimento / Diarreia / Filtração Limite: Child, preschool / Humans / Infant Idioma: En Revista: J Glob Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article