Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility and effectiveness of extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) among correctional populations: a systematic review.
Russell, Cayley; George, Tony P; Chopra, Nitin; Le Foll, Bernard; Matheson, Flora I; Rehm, Jürgen; Lange, Shannon.
Afiliação
  • Russell C; Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • George TP; Ontario Node, Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Chopra N; Institute of Medical Science (IMS), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Le Foll B; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Matheson FI; Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Rehm J; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Lange S; Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; : 1-20, 2024 Jun 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38940929
ABSTRACT

Background:

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reduce risks for overdose among correctional populations. Among other barriers, daily dosing requirements hinder treatment continuity post-release. Extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) may therefore be beneficial. However, limited evidence exists.

Objectives:

To conduct a systematic review examining the feasibility and effectiveness of XR-BUP among correctional populations.

Methods:

Searches were carried out in Pubmed, Embase, and PsychINFO in October 2023. Ten studies reporting on feasibility or effectiveness of XR-BUP were included, representing n = 819 total individuals (81.6% male). Data were extracted and narratively reported under the following main

outcomes:

1) Feasibility; 2) Effectiveness; and 3) Barriers and Facilitators.

Results:

Studies were heterogeneous. Correctional populations were two times readier to try XR-BUP compared to non-correctional populations. XR-BUP was feasible and safe, with no diversion, overdoses, or deaths; several negative side effects were reported. Compared to other MOUD, XR-BUP significantly reduced drug use, resulted in similar or higher treatment retention rates, fewer re-incarcerations, and was cost-beneficial, with a lower overall monthly/yearly cost. Barriers to XR-BUP, such as side effects and a fear of needles, as well as facilitators, such as a lowered risk of opioid relapse, were also identified.

Conclusion:

XR-BUP appears to be a feasible and potentially effective alternative treatment option for correctional populations with OUD. XR-BUP may reduce community release-related risks, such as opioid use and overdose risk, as well as barriers to treatment retention. Efforts to expand access to and uptake of XR-BUP among correctional populations are warranted.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá