Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Training and assessing convolutional neural network performance in automatic vascular segmentation using Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT.
Parry, R; Wright, K; Bellinge, J W; Ebert, M A; Rowshanfarzad, P; Francis, R J; Schultz, C J.
Afiliação
  • Parry R; School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. reece.parry@health.wa.gov.au.
  • Wright K; Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia. reece.parry@health.wa.gov.au.
  • Bellinge JW; School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
  • Ebert MA; School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
  • Rowshanfarzad P; Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.
  • Francis RJ; School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
  • Schultz CJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38967895
ABSTRACT
To evaluate a convolutional neural network's performance (nnU-Net) in the assessment of vascular contours, calcification and PET tracer activity using Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT. Patients who underwent Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT imaging over a 12-month period for neuroendocrine investigation were included. Manual cardiac and aortic segmentations were performed by an experienced observer. Scans were randomly allocated in ratio 641620 for training, validation and testing of the nnU-Net model. PET tracer uptake and calcium scoring were compared between segmentation methods and different observers. 116 patients (53.5% female) with a median age of 64.5 years (range 23-79) were included. There were strong, positive correlations between all segmentations (mostly r > 0.98). There were no significant differences between manual and AI segmentation of SUVmean for global cardiac (mean ± SD 0.71 ± 0.22 vs. 0.71 ± 0.22; mean diff 0.001 ± 0.008, p > 0.05), ascending aorta (mean ± SD 0.44 ± 0.14 vs. 0.44 ± 0.14; mean diff 0.002 ± 0.01, p > 0.05), aortic arch (mean ± SD 0.44 ± 0.10 vs. 0.43 ± 0.10; mean diff 0.008 ± 0.16, p > 0.05) and descending aorta (mean ± SD < 0.001; 0.58 ± 0.12 vs. 0.57 ± 0.12; mean diff 0.01 ± 0.03, p > 0.05) contours. There was excellent agreement between the majority of manual and AI segmentation measures (r ≥ 0.80) and in all vascular contour calcium scores. Compared with the manual segmentation approach, the CNN required a significantly lower workflow time. AI segmentation of vascular contours using nnU-Net resulted in very similar measures of PET tracer uptake and vascular calcification when compared to an experienced observer and significantly reduced workflow time.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália