Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of chronic care management service among Medicare beneficiaries in 2015-2019.
Jang, Jieun; McCarthy, Ellen P; Olivieri-Mui, Brianne; Shi, Sandra M; Park, Chan Mi; Oh, Gahee; Sison, Stephanie Denise M; Kim, Dae Hyun.
Afiliação
  • Jang J; Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • McCarthy EP; Department of Hospital Administration, Yonsei University Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Olivieri-Mui B; Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Shi SM; Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Park CM; Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Oh G; Department of Health Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Sison SDM; Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Kim DH; Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 2024 Jul 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38979879
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced chronic care management (CCM) services in 2015 for patients with multiple chronic diseases. Few studies examine the utilization of CCM services by geographic region, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics.

METHODS:

We used 2014-2019 Medicare claims data from a 5% random sample of fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or over. We included beneficiaries potentially eligible for CCM services because they had multiple chronic conditions (1,073,729 in 2015 and 1,130,523 in 2019). We calculated the proportion of potentially eligible beneficiaries receiving CCM service each year for the total population and by geographic region, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS:

The proportion of beneficiaries with two or more chronic conditions receiving CCM services increased from 1.1% in 2015 to 3.4% in 2019. The increase in CCM use was higher in the southern region, among dually eligible beneficiaries and beneficiaries with a greater burden of chronic conditions (2-5 conditions vs ≥10 conditions 0.7% vs 2.0% in 2015; 2.1% vs 7.0% in 2019) and frailty (robust vs severely frail 0.6% vs 3.3% in 2015; 1.9% vs 9.4% in 2019). Nearly one out of five recipients did not continue CCM service after the initial service.

CONCLUSION:

We found that CCM service is being used by a very small fraction of eligible patients. Barriers and facilitators to more effective CCM adoption should be identified and incorporated into strategies that encourage more widespread use of this Medicare benefit.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Am Geriatr Soc Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Am Geriatr Soc Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos